Before the Green Bay Packers
routed the Carolina Panthers 38-17 at Lambeau Field, Fox Sports Radio’s Tomm
Looney quite seriously predicted that the Panthers would win the game 34-27.
Besides being “looney,” he is the “liberal” sort who has a sensitive spot for
the new breed of quarterback, as represented by the likes of Cam Newton and Russell
Wilson. He went on to deride Washington Redskins quarterback Kirk Cousins, with
the now common refrain “be careful for what you wish for” to fans and
commentators who wanted to see Robert Griffin III benched. He noted with relish
that Cousins was replaced by Colt McCoy in the second half of the game against
Tennessee, who immediately threw a 70-yard touchdown pass and eventually
leading Washington to a 19-17 victory.
How Redskins fans will respond to
that development is an open question,
but there is no doubt that many people have chosen to overlook Cousins’ ability
to move the team up and down the field at will; in fact, in the five games he
has played prior to Sunday, the Redskins averaged slightly over 400 yards of
offense a game, mostly through the air. His primary fault seems to be an
overabundance of interceptions. But it is also a fair question to ask if
Cousins is still a better quarterback long-term than the injury-plagued RGIII. Just
in case people have already forgotten, RGIII has won just three of his last 15
starts (including the playoff game against Seattle), and his play has seriously
degraded due to his knee injuries.
Fans are not stupid; this is why
many pined for his backup. Is it really an “acceptable” situation to have a
starter who is no better than the second-stringer—or third-string quarterback,
for that matter? I know that many commentators want to see RGIII—limited pocket
skills and all—back on the field if only for personal political reasons. But I
would ask them “Do you want him on your team as your ‘franchise’ starting
quarterback?” I suspect that most (unless they are Redskins fans) would rather
see him stay right where he is at. I also think it is fair question to ask if
the Redskins have any intention of resigning RGIII when his contract is up; he
certainly has not demonstrated a “franchise” capacity to date.
Elsewhere, the Detroit Lions’
defense for the sixth straight game kept a lifeline open for the offense to pull
itself together just enough to win if it so desired. The Lions have been
scoring an average of less than 20 points per game over the past six, yet the
defense has helpfully outperformed it. It would seem surprising that a
quarterback as capable of putting up big numbers like Matthew Stafford has only
sporadically done so this season (even with an only occasionally available
Calvin Johnson). It will be that inconsistency that will place enough “doubt”
in the team to allow the expectation that Green Bay will eventually win the NFC
North.
In another game of note this
week, the Indianapolis Colts routed the supposed best “overall” team in the
NFL, the Cincinnati Bengals, 27-0; turnovers prevented the Colts from fully
exploiting their 506 to 135 dominance in total offense. The Bengals are now 0-2-1
in their last three starts. What I find particularly of interest is that while
Andrew Luck continues on pace for a 5,000+ yards passing season, Bengals
quarterback Andy Dalton continues to be a mystery. The inconsistency of his
play would seem to condemn the Bengals to competitive play (as long as their
defense is capable) during the regular season, but continued failure in the
playoffs.
No comments:
Post a Comment