Some people might be surprised by
the fact that largest number of foreign college students in this country are
not from Japan, despite the fact that they all “look” like they are; only 2.6
percent of foreign students are Japanese. In fact, they are outnumbered by
students from Taiwan (3 percent), Saudi Arabia (4.5 percent), Korea (9.5
percent) and India (13 percent); they do however outnumber those from Mexico
(less than 2 percent). Thus some people might be even more surprised to learn
that 29 percent of all foreign students in this country (about 235,000) are
from China.
Yes, that China that can hardly
be called “friendly” toward the United States. The country that has taken much
of U.S. manufacturing jobs, the country
that has been trying to corner the market on world natural and energy resources
much to our detriment, the country that has been increasingly belligerent
toward the U.S. militarily, the country that usually opposes U.S. policy
internationally, the country that threatens our allies in the region, and the country
ruled by a man who is said to be a “reformer” at heart, but like Vladimir Putin
in Russia has sought only to gain himself more and more power in a country in
which dissent is usually the occasion for various levels of extreme punishment.
And China is also a country that
has been accused of spying on an unprecedented scale in the U.S. It has been
suggested that Chinese students in the U.S. may constitute the largest spy ring
ever residing in one country in history. Of course this might seem a bit
farfetched, and to a certain degree it probably is. Chinese “spy” networks,
according to the “experts,” are more about quantity than quality; subtly seems
to escape them. But the sheer “quantity” of potential spies “overwhelms”
counterintelligence efforts to monitor their activities.
Why is the U.S. allowing so may
Chinese students into the country—especially in technologically sensitive
fields that would obviously only serve the Chinese government and military in
their efforts to subvert the U.S.? Supposedly the theory is that by bringing in
Chinese students who observe the “freedoms” available to them in the U.S., they
will take home with them a certain political “indoctrination” that will aid in
the establishment of a core of young people who desire political change in
China. The truth is probably more mundane: Cash-strapped American universities
(like the University of Washington) actively “recruit” high tuition-paying foreign
students to fill their coffers.
But if the case is “westernizing”
Chinese students, then this is wishful thinking. “High level” espionage is
conducted by the military—such as in cases where a “researcher” whose military
credentials are concealed “finesses” his or her spying conduct by seeking
information that at first seems merely of “scientific” interest. But that which
involves students and others working for U.S. companies operate out of
“overseas affairs” and “work” offices, which to be funneled through is seen as
a great “opportunity” to be “grateful” to the great leader and country for. Students
may view the opportunity to study abroad as a “gift” or “privilege” in which
they owe the state a debt. Chinese intelligence officials may remind them of
this “debt” to their home country, and it is their “duty” to discover as much
useful information as they can that will benefit the glorious state.
This type of espionage can be
nothing more than copying a few pages out of textbook, research notes or taking
a picture or two—just “innocuous” enough not to arouse attention. The student
may not even know that what he or she is doing constitutes “espionage.” While “espionage” on this scale may seem
trivial on an individual basis, if it involves thousands of students, it can
amount to something rather massive. Students may merely ask for “academic”
reasons access to classified information, or corporate “secrets.” Such
information could be extremely valuable if it is applied to the newest
technological advances. The fact that one-third of all Chinese students in this
country are at the graduate level and above—as many as half who are in
technological fields—only increases the opportunity for “minor” information
gathering to accumulate into a major espionage gains.
Of course, students are not the
only people conducting “business” for China in this country. According to the
CIA, China has more than 3,000 front companies in the U.S., whose principle
purpose is not to provide any useful service, but to gain access to “useful”
information for the home country. This may include setting up “conferences” in
which a Chinese “host” may persuade American researchers to “unwittingly” allow
the dissemination of sensitive information. Of course, China isn’t the only
country with students involved in espionage; Russian and Middle Eastern
students have also been suspected of doing similar spying. But it is the scale
of the spying done by China that is most difficult to get a grip on.
Unfortunately, while intelligence
agencies and private companies trying to guard secret or proprietary
information are concerned about this development, academia seems less so. In
fact, many American academics feel it is their “duty” to “share” information
with “colleagues” and students, regardless of who they are or what
potentially they may do with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment