Saturday, October 5, 2013

Recent "insane" acts in Washington, DC only reflect what is going in government



It seems as if the Tea Party insanity that has gripped the federal government has “rubbed off” not just on the Republican “old guard,” but some of the local constituency as well. On Friday, a man self-immolated on the National Mall in Washington, DC. The day before, a woman named Miriam Carey crashed some barriers with her car and led police on a wild chase on Capitol Hill before being shot dead; she apparently was on medication for symptoms of delusion—such as the belief that she was on “lockdown” by the president and was under “electronic surveillance.” CNN ran with the story all day, although the Seattle Times didn’t see fit to mention it until Page 5; maybe it didn’t have a “local” angle.

All that came after the Navy Yard shooting rampage by Aaron Alexis. On one late night radio talk show there was “speculation” that Alexis was the subject of a sinister government experiment intended to sway public opinion on the need for gun control legislation. Alexis had in the past claimed to be “hearing voices,” and the theory went something like an unnamed government agency was secretly bombarding him with microwave rays which carried human speech into his brain. The theory is insane, but the show’s paranoid right-wing listeners gorge on this kind of stuff.

Whether or not it can be conjectured that the lack of governmental sanity has had a sinister telepathic effect on the public consciousness, there is no doubt—thanks to the anti-government welfare recipients seated in Congress who have the audacity to cash a paycheck on the public dime—that what is going on inside the Capitol Building these days rarely resembles the activity of intelligent life. Since the Republicans and their Tea Party cohorts took back control of the House of Representatives in 2010, nothing but ineffectual, inconsequential and incompetent posturing has come out of it. It is the “work” of people who at least give the very strong impression of insanity.

The so-called “Obamacare” has, more than anything else, brought out the nonsense in many. Almost two years of difficult work that went into it, while Republicans refused to contribute even a single useful, constructive, sane idea to fix a problem desperately in need of repair. Since their only “contribution” was obstruction, Republicans have no right now to make “Obamacare” a rationale to hold-up the business of government without even seeing how the thing actually works in practice—particularly since the US Supreme Court has already upheld it constitutionality. 

Instead, we hear comments like “Individuals should have the right to delay Obamacare for a year, just like businesses,” instead of applying for the insurance exchange program now. Does this statement reveal daftness, or just insensitivity to the real needs of real people? The House leadership released a statement insisting that “The American People don’t want Obamacare.” Apparently not everyone in this country qualifies as “The American People” because many people actually do want Obamacare, or at least see what it can do for them after having been failed by the current “system.” Let's not be completely unmindful of the fact that this is the only country in the "civilized" world that does not have universal health care. That's supposed to be measure of this country's moral and ethical "superiority"?

Then we hear comments provided by NBC News from people of questionable lucidity in anti-government, neo-Nazi territory like Idaho and Montana. A certain Greg Collett in Idaho has no health insurance and doesn’t want it; he says the “government” has no business in the health care business. He has 10 children, all home schooled. They are also covered by Medicaid—a government health care program. Collet doesn’t see the inconsistency in his thinking; in fact he likens Medicaid to public education. One may question his logic, if not his soundness of mind.

Then there is a “John” in Montana, who thinks that having health insurance is not a “good idea” because it “drives up prices.” According to his “logic,” an individual should pay for services out of his/her own pocket without insurance; that’s fine—except that it only “works” if you never get sick or seek medical services, like John claims. But just in case John feels he might need it, he’ll “look into” the insurance exchange program, even though he doesn’t agree with “socialized” medicine. “I’m not a martyr,” he says. No, just another partisan hypocrite.

And finally there is “Mark,” a trucker in Colorado. His rig has a bumper sticker: “One Big-Ass Mistake, America”. Get it? He currently has no health insurance, but he’ll be signing up for the exchange anyways, because, after all, it might actually work for him. Isn’t that funny farm-ready? Sounds like some people dislike Obama (because of his race?) so much that only after cutting through the personal bullshit can they see that what he is doing actually helps them, too. Republicans just don’t want you to know that because, after all, they don’t care about you. Not really. 

No wonder some people have been driven over the "edge.”

No comments:

Post a Comment