About once or twice a week I go to a Wendy’s in Kent to eat
and compose, but this past Wednesday I found it roped-off by police. According
to news reports, a black Cadillac Escalade drove up to the adjacent convenience
store gas pump station in a “haphazard” fashion that blocked other motorists
from accessing the pumps. All four doors were thrown open and rap music was
blasting its foul message forth. According to a witness, the occupants were
“mean-mugging” everyone and apparently looking for a fight. The driver of the
car threatened the witness against taking down his license plate number. He and his passenger also engaged in argument with other customers. The
convenience store clerk came out to confront the passenger of the car, and an
altercation occurred.
The store manager then came out to break up the fight. The
driver of the car pulled out a hand gun and starting firing, eight to ten
shots; both the manager and the clerk died at the scene, while the Escalade
drove away. KOMO News—always thirsting for crime and blood—apparently had their
news van parked in the lot at least 12 hours after the shooting occurred. The
shooter was eventually apprehended in Burien, about ten miles away. Odd how all
of those cameras the police posted on the site to snoop on people were of no
use in preventing this horrible crime.
Why did this happen? Why were these two looking for a fight?
Why was the driver so eager to shoot someone? Was it “righteous vengeance” over
the incident in Ferguson, in another state? No, the shooter, Leland Russell,
claims that he had felt “disrespected” by road construction workers who
supposedly addressed him with racial (not “ethnic”) slurs. He apparently felt a
lack of “respect” for his person, and decided to “take it out” on the next
person who displayed a lack of “respect.”
Respect?
“Respect” is often a difficult concept to acquire or
provide; we can see this in something as “innocuous” as someone who urinates
all over a toilet seat, to cold-blooded murder for no apparent reason that even
remotely justifies it. When I was in the Army, a first sergeant informed me
that he “respected no man”—apparently not even the company commander. What was
his rationalization for such a statement? It went against the commandment “Thou
shalt not worship false gods before me.” I’m not sure that was the intent of
the commandment, but I suppose that in some way it makes sense—insofar as the
kind of people you meet who seem to demand your “respect” when you are loath to
give it.
This feeling occurs to me every time I go to the Kent Public
Library, one of the worst of its kind that I ever had the displeasure to
encounter. I remember when they closed it down for “reconstruction”; Instead of
tearing the whole place down or moving to a new, bigger location, they kept the
former shell intact and merely re-arranged the interior. In the end, it was the
same old crummy library, cramped and virtually impossible to spend any length
of time doing quiet work. There you can find all the rude, disrespectful people
you don’t want to meet.
For example, I’m sitting at a table reading and writing,
just hoping to have two hours of quiet time, and this barrel-chested eastern
European type plops himself at my table and pulls out his laptop computer, and
proceeds to engage in a long-distance conversation with someone back in his home
country—loudly and boisterously. Does this person have any “respect” for the
rights of other people? Am I supposed to “respect” his “right” to bother people
in a library who are trying to work? What about the librarians? I asked one of
them if this was allowed, and she just smirked at me and asked me what the
“problem” is.
In another example of how hard it is to “respect” a person,
a tattooed male walked in and parked his fundament in the table next to mine,
apparently trying to get the attention of a female who was reading a book. He
was trying to be friendly-like, but I could tell he was bothering her. I turned
his way and told him that this was a “quiet” area, which caused him to turn to
me with eyes lit-up like a stereotypical crazed person in an insane asylum,
asking me what my “problem” was. I could tell that this was deliberate pose to
“intimidate” me, but that kind of thing seldom moves me, unless common sense
tells me otherwise. Of course, he then
wanted to take this discussion “outside,” but I wasn’t that stupid. In any
case, he wasn’t getting anywhere with the female reading the book who just gave
terse responses to his affected gregariousness, and so he left on his own
accord.
I have to admit that I also find bike riders on sidewalks
extremely rude and disrespectful. The other day I was walking down a sidewalk
when some 6-2 guy riding a 10-year-old’s bicycle nearly ran me over from behind.
I commented on his rudeness and disrespect for my person, upon which he stopped
his bike and turned around and gave that at intimidating “stare.” Oh, he didn’t
like being told that he was a rude, disrespectful bastard? I encounter a lot of
people who show something less than respect for people (and not just to those
for whom sidewalks were actually built for), and then are “shocked” to be
called out for their personal limitations.
Incidents like this always cause me to wonder about the
nature of “respect.” Shouldn’t you give “respect” before someone expects to
receive it? I encounter many people—particularly those who possess a violent
streak simmering just beneath the surface—who demand “respect.” One should
respect another’s human rights, such their person and property. It is not
“respectful” to deprive them of either. The individual engaging in such may
believe that he or she is doing this because another person or society doesn’t
“respect” him or her, and thus it is their way of “earning” that “respect.” Of
course, the reality is that this usually has the opposite effect. In such
circles, “respect” is “earned” through crime and violence, or just being
“tougher”—or rather, more thuggish—than the next guy.
On the other hand, it is hard to “respect” even an outwardly
“respectable” person—one who dresses or speaks well, and makes a good living because
of it—when you perceive they don’t “respect” your own existence. I personally
see no more than a person who is the same common clay as anyone else, who will
eventually die like everyone else, probably leaving nothing behind of lasting
value, except maybe some old family photographs to remember them by. As far as
people with the Nazi in them, history has already judged their level of
“respectability.”
One can’t go about life dwelling on such things, however.
You don’t need the “respect” of every person to live a “respectable” life or to
justify your existence. Being perpetually angry at the world because of the way
you perceive it treats you and allowing it to govern your every action is not a
life, but a kind of living death. If “good” can’t be found in society, then
find it in its creations, or that of nature—the wonders of which are truly
deserving “respect.”
No comments:
Post a Comment