In Kent there used to be a bar & grill called “Papa’s
Pub,” where ordinary people could hang out
and talk, play pool or watch sporting events, and was spacious enough
that it never felt “crowded.” But one day it closed its doors, which I found
somewhat regrettable despite the fact that I had only been in the place a few
time for company gatherings.
Then one day a new proprietor claimed its former business,
renaming it “Bourbon Jack’s” with the ‘k” formed by the figure of a female
dressed in a “honky-tonk” outfit making a high kick. The name and symbolism
made the following statement: This is a “Country & Western, white-bread
hang-out for “real” Americans. And it accomplished exactly that; every time I
walk past it, I wish that someone like a Reggie Hammond from the film 48 Hours would stroll in and announce he
was the “new sheriff in town” and upset this little world of “redneck”
clientele.
I realize that places like this have a “need” to exist; I
can “understand” how people might want to congregate free of “gangstas,”
“thugs” or “punks,” but this goes way beyond that; I mean, these are white
people conscious of race who want a place where they can go and feel “at home”
among their own “kind.” The one thing about the new establishment that I find
requiring additional discussion is the prevalence of the display of the
American flag. Although I’ve never been in the place, you can’t help but notice
whenever you walk past the open front door that there is this huge—and I mean
huge—U.S. flag draped over almost the entire back wall. In the front of the
building are paraded old style political campaign flags—you know, from when
only the vote of white people was counted.
Not that I should be surprised by any of this; after all,
Kent is a Republican town with insular, provincial attitudes despite its phony
efforts at staging “culturally diverse” events to prove otherwise. But the
question is: What is the meaning of the American flag to people like this?
After all, these same people probably would show the same kind of “respect” for
the Confederate flag, which would seem a contradiction in terms—since the
“rebel” flag ostensibly stands for everything the “union” flag stands for, such
as freedom and rights for all people, not just white folks.
Now, technically-speaking the American flag is supposed to
stand for such flowery sentiments as the following:
We hold these truths
to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by
their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
We the People of the
United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure
domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general
Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do
ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Of course, the Declaration of Independence wasn’t without
its “caveats”—such as inciting racism: “He (King George) has excited domestic
insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our
frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an
undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.” The
Constitution also declared that slaves were three-fifths human, and the U.S.
Supreme Court decided in the Dred Scot case that blacks had no rights that any
white man was bound to respect, and this of course could be applied to other
races and ethnicities as well.
But that all changed with the end of the Civil War, at least
in principle, if not always in fact. After the war and when the Industrial Age
began in earnest, the U.S. accepted just about anyone without question (so long
as they were European) who yearned for “freedom.” Living free in the land of
opportunity was what the American flag stood for, regardless of previous class
or condition. Everyone was “equal” under the flag.
But some people—the so-called “real” Americans—merely saw “aliens”
who brought with them “alien” and “inferior” culture. They never understood—and
still don’t—that when you scratch beneath the surface, everyone really has the
same wants, needs and desires. But it goes beyond even that. “Real”—meaning
white—Americans believe that only those people who “resemble” the “founders” of
this country have any “right” to expect all of the “privileges” of being
“American.” To them, the flag represents exclusion, not inclusion. Their peculiar
brand of “America” is not the “New World” that the founders—particularly James
Monroe via the Monroe Doctrine—envisioned. It is rather a polished-up “Old
World” vision that is meant to define what an American in a race-based fashion.
The “flag,” then, represents European ancestry, belief in
white supremacy, a militaristic, chest-thumping attitude that Richard Slotkin
noted in his book Regeneration Through
Violence, that those white Americans who view of the nation as an
exclusively Anglo/Saxon/Nordic preserve inherently view the “dark people”
wherever they may be found as the “enemy”—a threat to their world, and control
of it, and need to be “eliminated” physically when "necessary," and symbolically
when not. This obviously explains why so many people—particularly the ones who
formed the “Tea Party”—became discombobulated when a black man was elected
president.
The flag should represent the nation and what its moral
principles are—not the bigotry of a single race. After all, there was a native
people here that predated the European invasion by at least 10,000 years. The
United States may be an entity created by the original (white) colonists, but
the ongoing construction of the country included such ingredients as the
exploitation and abuse of nonwhite
labor, and as political fodder as props of fear and scapegoat propaganda—and
they survived all of this to become Americans too.
Thus the “rednecks” who parade the flag need minorities in
order to create the illusion of some out-dated version of what being an
American means—just as many white Southerners still cling to the Confederate
flag when its true “meaning” has long been exposed and discredited as
racially-motivated hate. Otherwise, these people would be just an artifact of a
reactionary past, a sad and pathetic remnant that refuses to die out as the
dinosaurs of another age.
No comments:
Post a Comment