What a world we live in. I was wondering why flags are at half-mast in Seattle today, and after some poking around it was revealed it was in “honor” of the passing of Queen Elizabeth II. As I noted in a recent post, I don’t understand why she deserves such veneration, at least outside the “commonwealth” which the U.S. doesn’t belong to.
Anyways, when the mainstream media asks an English-speaking celebrity about the Depp trial, WTH do you expect them to say? They don’t want to be “canceled” or attacked by Heard’s shills. They will take a “neutral” stance, say they are tired of hearing about it, or they will take Heard’s side. Take for instance actor Brian Cox, who often plays foul-mouthed curmudgeons and was the original Hannibal Lecter. When asked by a British publication his feelings about Heard, he said that Depp benefited from being “loved” by the jury, and that he felt “sorry” for Heard for getting the “rough end of it.” Make me sick. People were not “loving” JD again until after Heard’s lies began to unravel, and she only got what a self-serving, deceiving narcissist deserves. Call it “karma.”
Then we hear from Heard’s agent that she didn’t become “bankable” from her Aquaman role. Why not? Because she is only “good” at playing characters much like herself, which unlike other actors who rode to stardom because they had winning personalities, Heard’s was distinctly distasteful and it showed on the screen. Perhaps that was a result of her “borderline personality disorder.” Dr. Curry, by the way, didn’t just make that up; Heard had already been diagnosed with it. We know that because in one of the audio clips it is mentioned by Depp and Heard does not deny it; we heard Kate James testify that Heard took several medications for mental health issues, and in the Australia audio, we only heard about the concerns for Heard’s mental health (the only “injury” seen was scratches deemed “self-inflicted”) and the amount of medication she needed.
Good god, Heard’s feverish supporters like Kat Tenbarge, Taylor Lorenz, Eve Barlow and Michele Dauber are so frustratingly deluded because they don’t take a second to realize that Heard’s stories—particularly the most lurid ones—just don’t “add-up.” The so-called “journalists” among them give journalism a bad name and causes people to distrust the mainstream media—and I mean both from the left and from the right (i.e. Fox News). “Opinions” are like assholes—everyone has one, and they are not “facts” unless backed-up by evidence.
Real “journalists,” such as those one might find on the YouTube channel “Heir of Justice,” recently completed a four-part examination of the Discovery+ “documentary” on the UK trial, which of course they found completely biased in favor of Heard, with only maybe five percent of it putting Depp in a “sympathetic” light. It left out the worst bits of Heard’s audio, equated Depp’s substance abuse with physical abuse, and used talking heads who apparently got their information from mainstream media headlines and took Heard’s testimony as gospel “truth.” From the descriptions we have been given concerning the Discovery+ “documentary” on the Virginia trial, it will follow the same "format," but will add the vilification of social media over its “horrible” treatment of Heard.
It is just so frustrating. Heard’s stories just don't align with the evidence or attempts to "visualize" them; we constantly hear in the audio Heard complaining that Depp always runs away when they were in the midst of another one of those unhelpful “discussions,” and she took photos of him passed-out when he supposedly took substances. So what is it—did he pass-out from using drugs, which we have “photographic evidence” of—or did he physically abuse Heard, in which we have precious little evidence of, and what “evidence” there is just doesn’t “add-up.” I did a little rewrite on my last Depp post to make sure I got Heard’s stories “straight”; believe me, it just made things worse for her.
I mean, this is a person who was so completely narcissistic that she never acknowledged during her testimony or witness statements that she didn’t see Depp between the birthday party incident and May 21, 2016 (when Depp announced he was through with her) because his mother was gravely ill and would pass away on May 20; he knew Heard didn't give a shit about his mother, but he did despite all that happened when he was a child. Compare this with the San Francisco audio in which we hear Depp, knowing Heard is recording it, tell her parents that he loved them and was sorry things didn’t work out. That was who she was, and who he was.
Heir of Justice also had a series on the "holes" in Heard's DVRO stories that included her 2016 deposition. It was noted that Heard only consented to producing a witness statement at the urging of The Sun prior to the UK trial, and she submitted seven different versions of this statement in an effort to put her lies into semi-coherent form; Heard’s claims on her final witness statement, of course, still didn’t “add-up”—more like trying to fit pieces from different puzzles together. You know, Taylor Swift has broken-up with so many “boyfriends” that you start to think that maybe she’s the one with the “problem”; the same with Heard. None of Depp’s former relationships (including his first wife) had anything bad to say about him; but everything went horribly wrong with Heard. So why her? Well, we know why.
We just want the effing truth. Over at Incredibly Average, they completed an examination of that incredibly frustrating 2016 deposition. People magazine had reported that Heard was “crying and screaming” when she arrived for the original date for the deposition, refusing to do it. Her attorney tried to calm her down and convince her to do it; he apparently promised her he would make sure she wouldn’t have to answer any “hard” questions.
We saw what he meant, as the attorney repeatedly made random and incomprehensible objections every time Heard was asked by Depp’s attorney about evidence that put her in a negative light, or she was unresponsive to most questions in which she was asked to explain her own actions. Heard only seemed animated when she could critique Depp’s drug use or use of words, or the incident where she (and as her sister would) forget that it was she who almost pushed Whitney down the stairs, as Jennifer Howe testified that she had been told.
Out of seven hours allotted for the deposition, at best there was an hour’s worth of Heard being “responsive,” and never about anything she had to explain what she did, including gaslighting the maid who discovered the feces on the bed. Fortunately for the truth, Heard wasn’t allowed to get away with this during the Virginia trial.
Again the refusal by the likes of Tenbarge, Barlow and Lorenz to acknowledge that they had been duped by Heard—instead to triple-down with offensive, illogical and false attacks on truth-seekers--must be countered again and again because they will not stop plying a false narrative based on Heard’s lies and their victim agenda. These people should have been buried by the truth long ago, if not for being shielded by the power of the mainstream media--or rather, the fear-mongering forces within it.
That hasn’t stopped Popcorned Planet, the Black Belt Barrister, TheRealLauraB, TheUmbrellaGuy, Andrea Burkhart, Frank Valchiria, Col. Kurtz and many others who have in a calm, reasoned manner examined the testimony and the evidence, which revealed the truth that could only have exposed the real Heard for the world to contemplate. These people are not the raving maniacs that Tenbarge and Lorenz would have you believe; if anything, that description fits them far better.
Of course there are other “truth-seekers” who have been the subject of “controversy” and concern for Depp supporters, although they have passed mostly under the “mainstream” radar, especially when they preface their videos with a “speculation warning” so they doesn’t get sued. The most notorious of this group is YouTuber Joseph Morris; in his calm but serious delivery, the claims made in his videos are a bit aggravating because they sound true—not of the “too good to be true” variety, but because they play right into the narrative what we would expect of someone of Heard’s personality and history. We want to believe his claims; the problem is that the “sources” for most of his claims are nowhere to be found elsewhere.
For example, Morris was the first to report a DV incident between Barlow and Heard, claiming that he had been told this by a manager at the hotel in Tel Aviv (Morris provides his “statement" but not his name) where this allegedly occurred. The original video is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wESeZWZIr4
Morris has added something to that story since then in an addendum to a post in which an alleged stripper who allegedly knew Heard during her “exotic dancing” days claims during a phone interview with Morris that besides stealing money from and starting fights with the other dancers, she passed herpes to an irate client during a lap-dance as described here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ds1AnEtlp_I; the herpes/Heard connection isn't new, as it circulated during the trial as the real cause for her alleged cut lip.
Morris then claims that he was told that no one at the Tel Aviv hotel ever saw Heard’s “rental” baby—which was deemed a “good” thing because, it seems, Heard was short of cash and was using the room for “escort services,” which explained the trouble with Barlow. This one is one of those “too good to be true” stories without independent corroboration, yet we wouldn’t be “surprised” if it was true.
In this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3Okdtvqw0c in which Morris uses a clip of an apparently agitated and hyperactive Cara Delevigne on her phone (perhaps “substance-enhanced”), an “ex” is claiming that Heard roped in a naïve Delevigne into her sordid world of sex parties and caused her to be practically “catatonic” with fear from Heard potentially ruining her life and career, probably with Heard claiming that she was a “willing” participant.
The sex party story didn’t originate with Morris, but with HouseInhabit, the author of which who claimed that she has several sources asserting that Heard recruited underage girls to perform sex acts for the viewing “pleasure” of rich billionaires. Again, the problem with Morris’ claims is not that they can’t be “true”—as mentioned they sound just like Heard from what we know of her personality—but that we are being asked to take his word for it, because we don’t know who his sources are and thus there is no way to verify that they are real persons to start.
There is one “caveat,” however. Morris was also the first to report that someone who claimed to be a juror in the Depp trial had posted answers to questions in an anonymous twitter account concerning the jury verdict: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYYYe42BGBg&t=102s
This video was also scorned by
Depp World as from a “not reliable source” who should be avoided. Yet what this
“fake” juror said was surprisingly similar to what the “confirmed” juror quoted
by ABC News said, suggesting that they could very well be the same person. This
isn’t to say that Morris’ other videos are fact-based, but again they do add-in
just enough known facts to make them sound so damn “familiar.” At least what he claims is more "true" than anything Heard's supporters have said.
No comments:
Post a Comment