A video resurfaces of Amber Heard showing us how she puts on a dress while drunk, while Johnny Depp gives his time to a boy who has had two heart transplants

 

Wouldn’t it be nice if the Depp-Heard soap opera would just end? We could just go back to the usual celebrity gossip routine that is mostly of interest to people who read People magazine. I would be satisfied with the latest film reviews (I don’t care for today’s “music” at all). I mean, I was not even aware of the Depp-Heard case until The Daily Mail released transcripts of those audio clips following the UK verdict, and of the Virginia trial not at all until I started seeing those hilarious TikTok compilations on YouTube lampooning Amber Heard’s testimony. Of course everything ballooned from there, and for Heard and her stans who simply cannot be honest with themselves, it will never be over, long after people get bored with them and tune out completely.

Meanwhile, Kat Tenbarge—who we can all agree is not an “objective journalist” and is a committed Heard stans—launched an attack on Andy Signore and the pro-Depp YouTubers in general. Yawn. Let’s face it: Tenbarge is not interested in facts, and she certainly isn’t interested in how some Heard supporters—like that “chateau bunny” and Michele Dauber—have disappeared from Twitter because of their continuous twittering vomit. "Chateau" got the "axe"...

 

 

...after posting one sociopathic comment too many, such as wishing various substitute terms for death on Depp supporters as if she really meant it. Why isn’t Tenbarge—or the mainstream media in general—reporting that Dauber’s social media hate machine is implicated in the suicide of Stanford student Katie Meyer? Because Dauber is a "sacred cow" and reporting the truth about her would have a "chilling effect" on the gender victim game?

An amusing tidbit has resurfaced from a public appearance by Heard in 2019, where she appears to be wearing a dress backwards and is clearly drunk with awkward movements and glazed eyes; was this supposed to be a “joke” she was playing on people? 

 

Heard’s defenders are playing the “whataboutism” game with this, but Johnny Depp had the self-control to never appear under the influence of substances during public events or during interviews like Heard—which of course suggests that Heard has even less control over such intake than Depp does. By the way, it’s hard to believe that Heard has been totally silent on social media; chateau bunny’s psychopathic commentary sounds like what we can imagine Heard is saying in private—whether intoxicated, off her medication, or whatever. I sure feel sorry for that kid if she is the one actually taking “care” of her, don’t you?

On the other side of the spectrum, JD continues to give time to good causes, such as recording this video for the Make a Wish Foundation in order to support a UK boy who has had two heart transplants and on palliative care, and to support his YouTube channel:

 

 

The goal of “Captain Kori” of Kraken the Box is to reach 100,000 subscribers, and since this video was posted yesterday that number has gone up from a few thousand to over 30,000 and will probably reach that goal in a day or so at this rate. That, I suppose, is what the power of redemption is. Of course there are those would say that no good deed should go unpunished, but then again those of such ill-will begs the question of how Depp ever allowed himself to get involved with that fucking nutjob who almost destroyed his life.

On the legal front, Depp’s team is arguing that those 93 pages of Heard’s “friends of the court” briefs should be thrown out, because first they are just an effort for Heard to skate around the 55-page limit for her “official” brief, and secondly because they are nothing more than blather from the usual gang of radical feminists and gender advocates who are completely biased with no objectivity whatever, whining about the “chilling effect” the Depp verdict has on the “right” of other women to make false claims against "powerful" men who have the means to defend themselves from those lies. 

What the appeals court rules on that could be seen as precursor for their ruling on Heard’s appeal in general—whose "arguments" could have a similar effect on the judges as Heard’s excruciatingly phony testimony had on the Virginia trial jury.