According to the Nielsen numbers
in 2019, Fox News was number one with an average viewership 2.57 million daily,
yet it was only 19th in the 18-49 demographic, averaging about 250,
000 viewers a day. The average age of Fox News viewers is 65, and well over
half of all its viewers are over 65. Now there are those who will point out
that viewers of MSNBC and CNN are also of similar age groups, although not of
similar demographic groups. According to Nielsen, MSNBC and CNN combined
averaged 2.8 million viewers daily, barely more than Fox News, of which an average
of 400,000 viewers were in the 18-49 age group. That means that the average daily
viewership of those 50+ for Fox News and MSNBC/CNN were about the same.
But there are flaws in any
calculation that suggests any kind of “equivalency.” During the critical month
of February of this year, Fox News achieved its highest ever viewership,
averaging 3.5 million daily, while MSNBC and CNN remained at 2.8 million
combined. Now, people will say that is “great” for Fox News, but is it “great”
for the country? February was the month when Fox News was at its most vehement
in claiming that the coronavirus “scare” was nothing but some liberal “scam”
that was meant to damage Donald Trump. Even Tucker Carlson, who has taken “credit”
for taking a different tact, seemed more motivated in making it a “racial”
issue—except that instead of the usual blaming migrants from south of the
border, it was the Chinese who were the “bogeymen.”
There are those who are now
suggesting that the reporting of Fox News on the coronavirus issue at least
into the beginning of March may have prompted a certain amount of indifference
to the virus problem, perhaps even a belief that it wasn’t “real.” Could this
belief have allowed the most vulnerable age group—60 or over—a false sense of “safety”?
I am curious about whether the residents of the Life Care Center in Kirkland,
Washington were “avid” Fox News watchers. That place is allegedly the
“epicenter” of the coronavirus “pandemic” in the state, which kind of makes it
the “epicenter” of the entire country. A
week ago, reports were that two-thirds of the residents were infected and 35
residents or those who come into contact with them had died. 48 of the staff and
visitors were also reported to be infected.
Again, outside of Carlson, everyone on Fox News until last week
was claiming that virus was a liberal” scam meant to hurt Trump, and we can
suspect that most of those residents were (given their age) likely watching a
lot of Fox News, and they were being told that the coronavirus issue was “not a
big deal.” Older people are the demographic most susceptible to the worst complications
of the virus, and they were hearing this. Trump—who was getting his “news” from
those claiming it was all a “liberal plot,” has been playing “general” for the past
week—after the “fake news” media and intelligence agencies have been since
January been reporting on the looming disaster. The New York Times reported that nurses and staff at the Life Care
Center were not properly “briefed” on the potential of a coronavirus outbreak,
and when residents who seemed “fine” a few hours prior suddenly became ill,
they had no idea why—allowing the virus time to spread, and fast.
We can’t know to what extent
people allowed their beliefs to be influenced by Fox News coverage of the
coronavirus outbreak from early January to early March. We do know that polls
showed that Fox News viewers were much less likely to believe the coronavirus
issue was “real” than those who received their news from MSNBC and CNN. Trump,
whose views were until March 11 obviously influenced by the naysayers, is still
attacking even Fox News (since it has “come around”) for criticizing his
bombastic, self-serving claims after the cat had been let out of the bag long
ago. The fact that Trump allowed himself to be “led” by the fact and
science-challenged Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and “Fox and Friends” for
months on the virus issue proves nothing else if not that he is a real “fake-news” junkie, and
the country is paying the price for it—as Fox News was raking in the profit while it was at it.
No comments:
Post a Comment