These days, events in Egypt and Syria have tended to slip
from the American public consciousness. Perhaps this shouldn’t be too
surprising, given that little has changed. In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood is
“officially” declared the terrorist group it always had been before it had been
given temporary “legitimacy” as a political organization and subsequently
abused its power. The declaration by the current ruling junta came following a
wave of bombings and the destruction of dozens of Christian churches in the
wake of the ouster of Mohammed Morsi as president. Some Muslim political
observers are claiming that “history” will record that Egypt only experienced
“true democracy” during the Brotherhood’s brief reign, but that is a
misinterpretation of what democracy is; the Brotherhood’s aim was eventually to
discard even the fig leaf of “liberal” democracy and establish an Islamic state—which
was practically written into its “constitution.”
Meanwhile, in Syria Bashar al-Assad still more or less
clings to power. In fact, after recent successful military offensives, which he
describes as "trying to restore security and stability in the main areas
that the terrorists have struck," after which "we will go after their
positions and sleeper cells later," the Syrian rebels—including Nursa, the
Islamic extremist group that wishes to establish an Islamic state in Syria—have
been on their heels in recent months. Even Syrian public opinion has moved
toward support for the Assad regime, after negative public relations moves by extremists,
including killing civilians in bomb attacks. Given the fact that there is a great
deal of apprehension now concerning what a post-Assad Syria will look like,
there is not so much enthusiasm in the outside world to find out, although
Western government spokespeople still talk the talk.
All of this has been overshadowed by the goings-on in the
Ukraine. Putin trying to take Obama for a sap by lying about Russia’s hand in
the unrest. Ukrainian “elite” forces conduct a brief offensive, and end up surrendering
their weapons to a pro-Russian mob. Russian media displaying its “independence”
by reverting to the days of old, as a propaganda organ for the Putin regime—accusing
the pro-West Ukrainian government of being a “fascist regime” under the control
of “the U.S. government.” Anti-U.S. and West news reporting is the most popular
programming in Russia today, and a poll suggests that most Russians don’t care
if they are being lied to by their government or not. Nevertheless, not
everyone in Russia is immune from the truth; recently 10,000 people staged a “March
of Truth” in Moscow, denouncing the Russian media’s parroting of Putin’s distortion
of reality.
I’m old enough to remember the closing decades of the Cold
War. When I was serving in the military, West and East Germany were still
separate countries, and I spent time doing night observation patrols on the
Czech border. One wonders what has changed; recently Russian fighter jets flew
over U.S. warships, and NATO has decided to beef-up its presence in Eastern
Europe. Satellite imagery suggests that Russian forces have not only been
building on Ukraine’s eastern border, but have actually infiltrated into
eastern Ukraine. Not a thing has changed in Russia’s adversarial attitude
toward the West since 1917; it still fancies itself a country under “threat” despite
its vast expanses and resources. This is apparently at odds with the West’s
desire that Russia become more like the West in its outlook, yet Russia today
seems more than ever moving toward retrenchment into the past.
No comments:
Post a Comment