Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Republicans and the Tea Party deaf to the rest of us on "Obamacare"



Republicans are currently threatening to shut down the government unless Democrats agree to “defunding” health care reform. Harry Reid rightly calls the Republican leadership cowardly for caving in to the “Tea Party anarchists.” According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, the definition of “anarchy” is the following:

A situation of confusion and wild behavior in which the people in a country, group, organization, etc., are not controlled by rules or law

More specifically,

a :  absence of government
b :  a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority
c :  absence or denial of any authority or established order

This is an accurate interpretation of what kind of country the likes of Senators Rand Paul and Ted Cruz, Representatives Joe Barton, Steve King and Joe Wilson seek. Texas alone accounts for 12 Tea Party members. These people want to gut government to the point where we actually do live in a country where the only “law” is that enforced by whatever suits the National Rifle Association and racist Council of Conservative Citizens. These people don’t give a damn about ordinary people and their tribulations—especially those on the lower end of pay and benefits scale; without protection from the federal government, they are forever subject to the predations of these “masters.” Make no mistake: Many senators and congresspersons seem to think that we still live in the pre-Civil War antebellum period, and this country is one big plantation where they and their corporate paymasters are the “masters,” and everyone else are metaphorical “slaves” with no “rights” save those they are “given.” The use of race-baiting tactics by the Right has the purpose of convincing many fools to go along with this.

People may not be aware of this, but businesses initially offered health care insurance not out of any altruism on their part, but because it was a “perk” that lured workers to work at one company over another. Businesses opposed universal health coverage because they saw it as an infringement on their “competitiveness.” But that was before health care and health insurance costs started spiraling out of control. Today many businesses provide no or poor health insurance to its employees. My company offers what is called an “income replacement” policy, not an actual health insurance plan; it pays a minimal lump sum and you are responsible for rest. The “plan” is actually illegal in the state of Washington, and listed as an insurance “scam” by the state insurance commissioner. Indeed, no general practitioner in the state will take you on as a patient if this is all you have to offer. Thus preventative care is not an option; if you have an accident or hurt so bad you have to go to the emergency room, good “luck.”

The state of Washington has bought into “Obamacare” and will offer the health insurance exchange program; whether or not I can apply for it is not clear, despite the fact that my current “insurance plan” is technically illegal in this state.  It is my understanding that its very existence makes me ineligible for the exchange program. In case you are wondering, the “situs” of the company I work for—meaning where it is located “by law”—is Texas, that hotbed of Tea Party insanity and opposition to health care reform. 

Why should I—and many millions of people in this country—be outraged by the actions of congressional Republicans and the Tea Party? Because once again they behave as if they are the only people who “matter,” and damn everyone else, regardless of the impoverishment of their situation and their rights and needs. “Obamacare” represents the best chance that millions of people who are not provided health insurance by their employers, have poor health insurance or otherwise cannot afford it, can afford adequate medical coverage that includes access to preventative care. While polls might reflect the attitude of people who already have “theirs,” all that proves is that the voiceless continue to go unheard.  Since Republicans are offering no alternative to “Obamacare”—their one “suggestion” being the ability to purchase “cheaper” insurance from other states, which is of course is exactly the kind of “insurance” I have—many of us can only look on helplessly as these wretched politicians have the inhuman indecency to decide if we should live or die, and how.

By the way, Factcheck.org tells us that all members of Congress have access to both private and federal medical plans, all of which “cover hospital, surgical and physician services, and mental health services, prescription drugs and “catastrophic” coverage against very large medical expenses. There are no waiting periods for coverage when new employees are hired, and there are no exclusions for preexisting conditions.” Of course, the government pays the lion’s share of the premiums; furthermore, “members of Congress also qualify for some medical benefits that ordinary federal workers do not. They are eligible to receive limited medical services from the Office of the Attending Physician of the U.S. Capitol, after payment of an annual fee ($491 in 2007)…House and Senate members also are eligible to receive care at military hospitals. For outpatient care, there is no charge at the Washington, D.C., area hospitals (Walter Reed Army Medical Center and National Naval Medical Center). Inpatient care is billed at rates set by the Department of Defense.”

One may be forgiven for wondering what Republicans and their Tea Party cohorts have done to deserve such generous benefits; after all, their goal is to gut government to such an extent that they don’t have to do any work at all. Who needs them? We all need to ask that question and why they have the audacity to tell millions of hard working people that they deserve less.

No comments:

Post a Comment