The life of Justin Roiland, the co-creator of the animated series Rick and Morty, took a predictable turn for the worse when an “unnamed” woman accused him, according the NBC News, of “one felony count of domestic battery with corporal injury and one felony count of false imprisonment by menace, violence, fraud and/or deceit,” which allegedly occurred in 2020 and led to a brief arrest and a potential trial this year.
Predictably without the benefit of due process, Roiland was “canceled” by everyone he was connected with. Also not surprisingly, Kat Tenbarge, who is the “tech” and “culture” reporter on NBC News Digital—meaning she has a virtual free hand to make a fool of herself that she wouldn’t last long engaging in if she was on broadcast television—was all over the story, the truth and due process be damned :
But before we get to the “rest of the story,” what we learn about Tenbarge is that although she keeps her “professional” and “personal” views—meaning that expressed on social media—separate, the “personal” does influence the stories she chooses to cover on the “professional” side. For example, in regard to a story on Andrew Tate, she quoted several people who said variations of this: "If Andrew Tate is guilty of human trafficking I believe he deserves a death sentence."
As in her more recent story on Tate in which she added her own “embellishments” and the “interpretations” of Tate’s alleged crimes by others, she has never discussed the “other side” of the case—which includes denials of trafficking by the so-called “victims,” aside from the prop who was sent to Romania to lie and set-up the Tates—but that it looks increasingly likely that prosecutors will eventually drop the charges for lack of evidence, and are only maintaining the illusion that there is a "case," likely to appease a certain foreign government and the gender activists pushing it to "act."
But the Tates are only accused of “trafficking” phone sex workers who basically tell their customers on the other end what they want to hear. Yet Tenbarge—at least on her “digital news” page—has seemingly been supportive of female sex workers who earn their living on porn sites and/or “advertise” on Instagram. Thus her attacks on Tate for operating a “phone sex” service seems a bit hypocritical; obviously what she and other “feminists” don’t like about him is that he is what they would be seen as if they switched genders.
We can see that Tenbarge’s stories are top-heavy with sex and gender-related issues, mainly of the negative variety. She never speaks to the concerns of other groups—such as the fact that Latinos are voiceless in both “culture” and in the “media,” while other groups (like women) have an “open mike” to whine and complain about anything that piques their narcissism.
And of course we know that narcissists need each other’s support, so we are presented with a headline which falsely suggests that Amber Heard got even a red cent from Johnny Depp in “her” settlement: “Amber Heard settles defamation case against Johnny Depp.” Tenbarge didn’t mention in that story that the verdict that found that Heard had defamed Depp with malice still stood, or that Heard’s own “defamation” claim was actually for a statement made by another person, not Depp.
It’s amazing how hypocritical “gender sensitive” environments are. Take Seattle, for instance. These two statues are considered “appropriate” for public viewing...
…but the original Starbucks’ logo is considered “inappropriate”:
The people who commissioned those statues apparently didn’t believe that these might be “offensive” to some people, particularly given the implication of pedophilia—which might not have been the intent, but we are talking about America, which unlike Europe has an unhealthy attitude about sex and nudity. Public displays of female nudity, even via inanimate objects, is forbidden in Seattle, so it is easy to become cynical about gender hypocrisy.
Then there is this story from the UK last week where a female teacher at an all-girls school was fired after saying “Good afternoon, girls” and a few students made a formal complaint against her for “misgendering” them because they considered themselves “binary” or “trans,” and of course the “woke” school backed them. Well, I say let’s not be hypocrites here: if you can’t figure out what your gender is because you think you are one thing and have the “parts” of another, then go to a co-ed school where the teacher can say “Good afternoon girls and boys” and you won’t be offended—unless of course there is some other “name” people are supposed to call you. Problems, problems. Isn’t life short enough?
Of course gender hypocrisy is quickly becoming more and more encased in American society, and we see this in the case of Tenbarge, whose primary claim to people even knowing she exists continues to be her insane insistence on convincing people that Amber Heard is not the liar and abuser that history, audio recording and a jury verdict tell us she is, and that she completely blocks out any facts that harm the validity of her own “narrative.” Few people take Tenbarge seriously if they take the time to care at all; she has mainly become a source merely of frustration and bewilderment.
There are those who don’t want to be too harsh with her by accepting her own vague claims with she uses as a frame to justify her acceptance of other accuser's stories, but like those who tried to give Michele Dauber the “benefit of the doubt” on those terms, it should be noted that there is no real “evidence” behind those claims, just Tenbarge’s “word.” If she defends Heard’ obvious lies, then why should we believe her own "word"? Tenbarge is one of those people with a preconceived victim philosophy and is self-obsessed with her own narcissistic egotism, and she apparently feels the need to keep hammering away with the lies not necessarily to Heard’s “benefit”—because we may presume that Heard by now wants people to stop talking about this too—but to appease her own dark fantasies.
Her latest social media posting has disturbed some people, since it clearly is a last-ditch effort to “convince” people that Heard is the "real deal." There she is, three years on as if she is just “discovering” it, Tenbarge dredges up the UK trial verdict, and in response Andy Signore at Popcorned Planet brought back the Black Belt Barrister in the UK to remind people that Heard was not the defendant in that case, so she was not required to provide proof of her claims like she was in the U.S. trial, and The Sun only needed to show that they didn’t know that the stories Heard was feeding them were obvious lies.
In the judge’s “opinion,” the barrister again demonstrated that he took Heard’s word at face value, ignored evidence that suggested Heard was lying, or wouldn’t know she was lying about until the U.S. trial—such in regard to the “donations” that the judge was mightily “impressed” with when Heard claimed that she had paid the “entire” $7 million divorce settlement to “charity.” But as we would discover, Heard was actually the selfish narcissist for whom the only “charity” she knows is herself. She even treats that child she was too vain to carry herself as a mine-all-mine “prop” like those dogs she was once so fond of, but you never see around anymore.
So what kind of person overlooks all of that and still defends Heard and her lies? Probably someone with similar personality traits, to be honest. Tenbarge wants to beat on you until you “believe,” and if you refuse to, she will try to destroy you like Heard tried to destroy Depp. But then again, whose listening?
So what was the “rest of the story” in the Roiland case? The Orange County, California, District Attorney’s Office last week dismissed all charges against him: “We dismissed the charges today because there was insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt” a spokesperson said in a statement from the office. Apparently “significant additional information came to light” that revealed the claims against Roiland to be fabricated. In his own statement, Roiland called the accuser an “embittered ex” who took advantage of the MeToo hypocrisy to “bypass due process” and have him “canceled.”
Cases like this could only in the past year have been brought to a point where there is at least a chance for the falsely accused to be heard. Of course that angers people like Tenbarge, who also took the time to attack Colonel Kurtz on her work exposing the Marilyn Manson hoax (although only on her social media accounts--Tenbage only attacks men on her "news" page).
The exposing of the hypocrisy and the lies when due process is allowed to run its course drives people like Tenbarge "wild"
because for them it is “personal.” But we can live with that, because people like Tenbarge are becoming just annoying gnats you occasionally have to swat away. Unfortunately, the mainstream media at large still hasn't learned that the accused have rights they ignore with impunity, and gleefully destroy people's lives before the facts are all in.
No comments:
Post a Comment