Well, we know who Kat Tenbarge and the rest of the “mainstream media” doesn’t want to hear from: those Johnny Depp trial jurors.

 

With the Supreme Court continuing to go “rogue” and the alleged assassination attempt on Putin having the foul aroma of a “false flag” event, why not a “non-news” event? Well, there is Amber Heard's "unforgettable" weekend at a film festival nobody here heard of for a film opening hardly anyone attended, some of whom fell asleep during the screening, and most left before it ended, and one person who actually stayed to the end admitting that Heard's acting was the worst part of a bad film.

Well, that actually was "news, but this was not: On June 1, the names of the jurors who unanimously found that Amber Heard had lied about the alleged abuse she accused Johnny Depp of committing against her—and did so with “actual malice”—were supposedly released to the public after being under seal for a year. There was talk that there would be a rush to speak to individual jurors to explain why they came to their verdict, but curiously we have heard nothing from them.

On the other hand, we shouldn’t be surprised at all about this. The mainstream media and various Heard shills continue to push a narrative that takes no consideration of what the jurors saw and heard that was completely at odds with it. Outside the brief comments of an anonymous juror posted by ABC News last year, there has been little interest in the views of jurors by the media who sat through six weeks of testimony and evidence presentation.

In fact, what we heard from the Heard shill media were claims of a trial that was “an orgy of misogyny,” and jurors were allegedly influenced by messaging from pro-Depp social media and TikTok videos that tore apart Heard’s appallingly phony emotions and nonsensical stories on the stand, although there was plenty of pro-Heard social media that was evidence that brain cell death and dementia can occur at any age. But there is no evidence that the jurors were in any way influenced by anything but the evidence presented at trial; that is the one thing that Heard media shills wish no one to think about.

We also hear widespread frustration from Heard shills that the trial was televised publicly, as if this would have influenced the jurors’ verdict. Again the hypocrisy of the pro-Heard media is of the hair-pulling, bang-your-head-against-the-wall variety. What would the mainstream media’s explanation be when their headlines all pointing to the guilt of Depp and Heard as the victim of abuse was not substantiated by the evidence that the jurors saw?   

Of course we also saw this played out in the Trayvon Martin case, when after he had been demonized and dehumanized by the media for a year, George Zimmerman was acquitted at trial for reasons of self-defense, yet he continued to be hounded like an animal by the mainstream media for years afterward.

All we are left with is people like Kat Tenbarge continuing their one-sided, evidence-free melee of misinformation and lies, and people with similar views in the mainstream media desperate to keep a lid on what the jurors have to say, although it may also be true that the jurors are reluctant to come forward and be demonized and dehumanized by people like Tenbarge and Heard’s other nutcase stans—some who may threaten “violence” on their persons.

But at least we have the comments of that anonymous juror a year ago: that the jurors didn’t believe Heard’s “crocodile tears,” that they thought Heard as “acting” when she turned from “crying” to “ice cold” on a dime, that she made them feel “uncomfortable” by constantly staring at them as if she was trying to gaslight them. They also felt that Depp’s testimony was more “authentic,” and that Heard’s baldest lies—including that concerning the donations—also turned them against her. The juror also stated that they paid no attention to social media or any other media as instructed by the judge. Furthermore, they mostly ignored the testimony and depositions of “friends” and focused on the evidence.

Those who watched the trial live or viewed the video recaps on YouTube saw what the jurors saw and could only come to same conclusion: that Depp was the true victim in that relationship, and that Heard was a liar and faker who presented “evidence” that was completely at odds with her stories: that “bruise” on her arm that she claimed occurred during the same “incident” where her face was cut so badly it sprayed blood on the wall (or was it the refrigerator), and yet her face showed no injury at all; those odd-looking facial "bruises" that were clearly the result of filler injections; the hair that showed no follicles if it were actually pulled out of her scalp, and were likely hair attachments or what Heard had cut herself; and the disappearing "split lip" on the James Corden show.

And there was the suddenly bruiseless Heard and her friend Raquel laughing and whooping it up a day after she received her TRO, which she herself would break just months later. In fact we would see the same “bruise” in the exact same spot six years later in Spain—now clearly seen as a zit “bruise.” It is clear that Heard took random photos of herself with random "injuries" which she could find "useful" later.

All this occurred when Depp was allegedly in an alcohol and drug-fueled haze, which “explained” why he didn’t “remember” his abuse to Heard. And yet Heard took all those photos of Depp allegedly “passed-out”—rather than just napping—from his drug and alcohol activities, where he was suspiciously not in fact seen physically abusing Heard. In fact time and again we heard on those audios it was Heard (when not confessing to “hitting” him) accusing Depp of “violence” against her simply by leaving the premises instead listening to her nonstop complaints with no end, no resolution and no point.

That is what the jurors heard and saw, and so, yes we shouldn’t be surprised at all that we haven’t heard from them, because the mainstream media and Heard shills (most of them “bots”) do not want to hear any of that. This is simply current “victim” hypocrisy in action, which chooses to ignore the fact that there are two sides to every coin—and just because the “wrong” side keeps coming up, just re-flipping the coin until you get the “side” you want won’t change the truth.