This past Sunday Fox News viewers must have been wondering what planet they living on if they happened to be watching Rep. Liz Cheney’s interview on Fox News Sunday. For them, Fox News is their “mainstream” media, and anything outside of confirmation of their own bigoted beliefs are social media trolls who are blinded by the cult of Trump. Oh wait, I think I got something mixed up there.
You simply can’t trust the mainstream media if it deliberately withholds information to allow you to make informed decisions. Now, it is true that Fox News is more guilty of this than others, but the so-called “liberal media” also has a habit of withholding information that undermines certain social positions. Black voices are well-represented on CNN, so it is not "kosher" to talk about the fact that blacks commit crimes at three times their percentage of the population, so it isn’t discussed at all. But in regard to gender politics, anything that disturbs the activist/victim narrative must be countered at all costs, even to the cost of the truth.
Now, has the mainstream media told you anything about the $27 million lawsuit filed against Johnny Depp by a certain Kristine Ledford back in April, and was dismissed as “frivolous” by a judge a week ago? If there was anything that harmed Depp’s case the MSM certainly would have mentioned it; that it wasn’t mentioned at all was because it was more likely to have harmed Heard’s case. Reading Ledford’s court filing makes it clear that this case takes dementia to a whole new level; you can find it here if you are in the mood for satire:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.850562/gov.uscourts.cacd.850562.1.0.pdf
I viewed one YouTuber, a black woman who is also a gender activist, torture herself into somehow gleaning something useful out of the insane ramblings while posting images of Depp as if he was actually “guilty” of something. She “discerned” that this woman’s few moments of "clarity"--I didn't see any--suggested she was a sexual violence survivor, but I felt compelled to point out that this woman was simply channeling the MSM’s pro-Heard propaganda into some fantastical belief that Depp—and numerous other named individuals like Tom Cruise and Elton John—had “defamed” her for some imaginary reason. She probably "settled" on Depp to take advantage of the defamation trial.
What
was alleged to be "coherent" in Ledford's brief was something about a masseuse
“business” in Oregon (it’s not clear what her connection to it is) being busted
as a prostitution racket (thus "defaming" her), which you have to perform some twisted "logic" to see as “evidence” that she was a victim of sexual
violence. Some of us may think that this stretching of reality and logic by gender
activists can be dismissed by sensible people, but the “reality” is the fact
this is the kind of tortured methodology used to maintain the need to “believe
all women” at any costs by the mainstream media and gender activists in questionable cases.
There are the occasional lonely voices in the "mainstream media": Judith Newman wrote in Los Angeles Magazine “Imagine if the lesson the media gleaned from this trial were reframed to resemble how it’s been understood across social media? Far from the bitter end to the victims’ rights movement, the verdict actually marks a powerful moment of inclusion for all abuse victims and survivors.”
But no, “It’s time to believe all women” exclaimed Vogue. The MeToo movement has had a corrupting influence since it totally dispenses with evidence, due process and purposely excludes men (unless they were victimized by another man). For accused men it is guilty until you are dead, and you are still guilty. But the Depp case proved that it doesn't have to be that way. Evan Rachel Wood and Moira Donegan are currently being sued for slander, and MeToo mavens like Alyssa Milano and Rose McGowan are engaged in ridiculous feuding among themselves.
With the Depp case over for at least
for another few months before the appeal paperwork is finalized, Col. Kurtz has
moved on to the case of a musician named Marilyn Manson, another man who has apparently been
“cancelled” by a “sinister” cabal of MeToo fanatics energized by Heard’s attack
on Depp; here she discusses her view about the accusations against Manson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-Me6ChXmA8, led by his former fiancé, the aforementioned Wood. This would seem to be more proof that the MeToo movement has had a
corrupting influence on society, since it totally dispenses with evidence and due process (that “believe
all women” is the mantra), and many suspect much if it is motivated by simple revenge
and vindictiveness.
Col. Kurtz (not sure what her real name is) talks here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfXmy_jgAFA about reading the most recent filing by Manson who is accusing Wood of conspiring with her ex-female lover (didn’t Heard have a couple of those too?) to concoct a fake FBI letter, pass it around to Manson’s former relationships, and persuade them to join her “crusade” to “cancel” him. Of course Manson is one of those “shock rockers” who paints himself up like Alice Cooper and a typical “punk” musician, so he’s an easy target. Wood was “friends” with Heard, so we can surmise where she got the idea to take personal revenge on Manson for whatever reason, probably to make her feel “important.” However, Wood doesn’t pretend to be an “activist” like Heard, who was clearly heavily intoxicated for her get-out-the-vote “speech” in 2018, and was escorted off the stage by the event promoter after making a few drunken sailor remarks:
Col
Kurtz allows Heard some faint praise by noting that unlike Wood, she didn’t
personally try to recruit any of Depp’s former relationships (outside of Ellen
Barkin, who only testified that Depp was “controlling” to her, not abusive),
although she did hire a private detective to uncover rumors of abuse; he
failed to find any evidence of such, although he did find a great deal of
evidence of Heard’s family and friends abusing his good nature and open
pocketbook. On the other hand, Wood and her co-conspirator and ex-lover, Illma
Gore, went about “basically constructing a MeToo style hoax that led to his
(Manson's) cancellation.”
The “hoax” includes the fabrication of a letter from an FBI agent which claimed that Wood's life was in "danger," and it was used both against Manson to convince others that he must be an abuser, so they must support Wood’s suddenly “remembered” allegations with their own “suppressed” memories--but also against another of her ex-fiancés, a Dr. Jamie Gill, using it as an excuse to prevent him from seeing his child in their custody dispute. Like Heard never believing that Kate Moss and many others would not testify to contradict her lies, Wood apparently believed in this “believe all women” world that no one would investigate the self-serving fraud she engaged in to hurt others and raise her "profile" at the same time.
Like other (bi-sexual) women who think fathers (and men generally) are unnecessary “distractions,” Col. Kurtz tells us that Wood (taking after Heard again), is begging “just to be left alone in her latest Instagram messages” but “this sort of cowering in the corner to just leave me alone” is just like “people like you who always say that after you've taken a (fucking) blow torch to other people's lives"--meaning Manson's and the father of her child.
Wood apparently made her own high-priced attorney look like a fool trying to confirm the validity of the faked FBI letter she or her co-conspirator concocted, and other faked evidence against Manson included stock photos from Pinterest showing alleged “love bites” that were quickly called out and removed from an accuser’s Instagram. Wood also claimed that messages that appeared on her account from people who were denying they said Manson was an abuser came from Manson supporters who hacked into her account. Col Kurtz observes that having destroyed Manson’s life, his accusers are acting “like the crazy girls in The Crucible dancing around having a ball. It's not funny in that sense but it is funny in the sense that to a degree Evan Rachel Wood and Illma Gore and a number of these others they are the gang that couldn't shoot straight.”
Anyways, if Manson’s defamation case actually goes to trial that will be a year or two away, as will the libel case against Moira Donegan. Meanwhile, Heard friend and whacked-out feminist Eve Barlow posted this shamelessly fake, photo-shopped image of Camille Vasquez and Dr. Curry partying together as if she believes there is a sucker born every minute (they're all Heard supporters, apparently)...
...while wacked-out feminist law professor from Stanford University, Michele Dauber, is still making ridiculous comments about Depp on her Twitter page, which we discover courtesy of Frank Valchiria https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFXoJd9X30A. Dauber engages in “age-shaming” and suggesting pedophilia from scenes of Depp embracing young fans during his European tour with Jeff Beck. Frank is Italian and he says this is normal behavior, and observes that Depp’s fans want this and he's just playing along to show his appreciation for their support. Frank noted that Dauber was going berserk over a video of a little French girl wearing a Captain Jack outfit…
…and it must be sending Heard into fits to see this sort of thing when her only “friends” these days are those considered “loyal” enough to be in her all-female posse (Whitney’s hiding back there somewhere), here at the UK trial where they knew they just had to show up to win because the judge’s son worked for The Sun, which was being sued and thus he was biased from the start against Depp’s case:
What a fun group. Meanwhile, the mainstream media continues to make desperate efforts to keep Heard propped up to save their own “credibility.” Over at Popcorned Planet, Andy Signore revealed audio from a call with NBC’s alleged “tech” journalist named Kat Tenbarge, which on the surface seemed civil and sensible, although Tenbarge didn’t give away her own views, which were heard an NBC’s recent so-called 27-minute “documentary” that was simply a hit piece slamming social media for its largely pro-Depp slant. Signore calmly and reasonably laid out the facts about why people did not trust the mainstream media to disseminate the facts. These views did not make the final “cut,” and Tenbarge either twisted his words or ignored them altogether, putting her own self-serving “spin” on why people were supporting Depp.
Another YouTuber under attack by Heard supporters, who calls himself the “Umbrella Guy,” revealed that he was contacted by a person connected to a production company concerning input into a two-part documentary on the Depp trial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FTKtCKZAls. He declined, recognizing it was another hit piece by Warner Brothers on their Discovery+ channel to counter the perception that its pro-Heard stance is hurting business and its stock prices—and the potential of losing hundreds of millions of dollars if there is a mass boycott of Aquaman 2. Variety’s latest story is headlined “With a 2023 Slate Hobbled by Controversial Stars, Warner Bros. and DC Stick to 2022 Titles in Muted Comic-Con Appearance.” Of course they are referring to Heard and Ezra Miller from The Flash. Variety notes that Warner Brothers can’t figure out “How to promote their escapist superhero franchises when their stars are embroiled in toxic scandals that overwhelm all other conversation about them.”
The absurdity of all of this is that, regardless of how social media viewed the Depp case, this was decided by a jury that listened to six weeks worth of testimony and evidence, and the mainstream media still refuses to understand that Depp fought against all odds for the truth as he saw it, which was that Heard was the abuser in their relationship; she was the only former partner who accused him of abuse (even the snarky Barkin only accused him of being “controlling”), so what was it about Heard that was different? Can we say that unlike his other relationships, Heard was bi-sexual? I mean, that does have something to do with her attitude toward men, doesn’t it? She certainly acted like the “butch” partner in that assault case at Sea-Tac Airport in 2009.
The star of Shazam, Zachary Levi, said recently about the Depp trial “There’s a
part of me that just wishes nobody would care about any of that drama as it
unfolds. Because it’s not pertinent to anybody’s life, really, or making the
world a better place.” The problem with that attitude is that if nobody was
paying attention to the case no one would be the any “wiser” about Heard and
her crimes against the truth--and the world would be a worse place for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment