Donald Trump’s so-called “senior
advisors” are either “all in the family”—meaning their “loyalty” is taken for
granted—or hold views that are so extreme that Trump doesn’t have to concern
himself with hearing things he doesn’t want to hear, save on those occasions
when his own views are even more extreme and defeat his own purposes. In the
latter group of course is Stephen Miller, who has no qualifications to be a
“senior advisor” save for his dependably racist and white nationalist views,
views welcomed not just by Trump but by Miller’s former boss Jeff Sessions, who
repeatedly blocked bi-partisan immigration reform as a U.S. senator. Why people
like Miller hate Hispanics goes well beyond the “illegal alien” trope, since
Hispanic illegal immigration has either stagnated or actually decreased in
recent years, while that from Asia has been growing by leaps and bounds (from
India alone, the number has risen from an estimated 28,000 in 1990 to at least
a half-million today), yet the likes of Miller do not seem to be concerned
about those people.
Miller’s anti-Hispanic attitude seems to stem largely because he simply doesn’t like them around; he once called a high school classmate to say that they couldn’t be “friends” anymore because he was “Mexican,” and he once ran for class president on the “platform” of rescinding a school policy that students refrain from throwing garbage on the floor; Miller insisted that it was the “Mexicans” job to clean-up after lazy white litterbugs like himself. Let’s not forget that Sessions “loaned” Miller to Trump’s campaign while Miller was engaging in his Breitbart propaganda campaign to smear Hispanics. Knowing Trump doesn’t like to read, it is very likely he kicked-off his presidential campaign targeting Hispanics with ugly stereotypes (illegal immigration is only a cover for the wider “campaign”) on the “advice” of Miller.
Miller’s anti-Hispanic attitude seems to stem largely because he simply doesn’t like them around; he once called a high school classmate to say that they couldn’t be “friends” anymore because he was “Mexican,” and he once ran for class president on the “platform” of rescinding a school policy that students refrain from throwing garbage on the floor; Miller insisted that it was the “Mexicans” job to clean-up after lazy white litterbugs like himself. Let’s not forget that Sessions “loaned” Miller to Trump’s campaign while Miller was engaging in his Breitbart propaganda campaign to smear Hispanics. Knowing Trump doesn’t like to read, it is very likely he kicked-off his presidential campaign targeting Hispanics with ugly stereotypes (illegal immigration is only a cover for the wider “campaign”) on the “advice” of Miller.
Miller is one kind of “senior
advisor.” The other is the kind with the “family” connection, like Jared
Kushner. Kushner is an “advisor’ with no qualifications and nothing to show for
his “senior” position. He initially was given a portfolio of “responsibilities”
that even qualified advisors with long records of public service would find
challenging, but for someone with no experience save for being a businessman of
no particular note it was clearly just a matter of “loyalty.” Kushner was among
other things Trump’s “point man” in the Middle East, smoothing things over with
the Saudi crown prince after the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, and then he was
supposed to concoct a “peace plan” that was never taken seriously for a minute
by any party. Today, Trump’s Middle East policy is in a shambles, no thanks to
his inexperienced and unqualified “senior advisor.” Kushner is currently “in
charge” of Trump’s wall-building project, which at this point he does more
“overseeing” than actual work.
But Miller and Kushner are not
Trump’s most trusted “senior advisor”; that would be his daughter, Ivanka, who dotes on daddy and apparently is “flattered” by his
suggestions of incestuous lust. What exactly she “advises” daddy on is not
precisely clear, since although she claims to have a similarly large
“portfolio” as husband Jared, the only policy initiative that can be said to
have been “influenced” by either she or her husband to date was convincing
daddy to sign-off on an executive order barring anti-Semitic “free speech” on
college campuses, saying nothing about racist, white nationalist speakers being
invited by “conservative” student groups. Kushner, who is Jewish, and Ivanka,
who is converted Jewish, both stood beaming behind daddy as he put his
illiterate scrawl on the order. I hate to beat a dead horse, but we have to
remember that it is a man of the Jewish persuasion (Miller) who is facilitating
the caging of children in concentration camps. Given past history, the fact that
a man of the Jewish faith is doing this makes the word “irony” unsuitable to
even describe it. Miller’s desire to stop not just all immigration from what he
would call “shithole” countries, but to find ways to deport legal residents and
even naturalized U.S. citizens recalls pre-war Nazi Germany, and somehow the term
“exterminate” in regard to halting all Hispanic immigration seems an
appropriate descriptor. While I commend the Jewish liberal
organization The Forward for calling
out those who would accuse Miller’s detractors as “anti-Semitic,” the fact is
that Miller isn’t going anywhere as long as Trump is in office.
What does “senior advisor” and
mother herself Ivanka have to say about this? I mean, it isn’t like she and
hubby don’t talk about caging children, since he is in charge of (or rather, “oversees”)
the building of the “wall.” But apparently this is one thing that Ivanka
doesn’t bother daddy about. While Newsweek
was pointing out that Ivanka’s “accomplishments” are more fog than
fire—including the phony claim that she was “responsible” for creating all the 6 million new jobs in this
country since Trump took office (plus another 8 million or so that can’t be
accounted for), on Face the Nation she
defended herself by claiming that putting children in cages was not part of her
“portfolio.” This was not a “new” excuse, either; back in July, she made the
bizarre claim to the panelists on The
View that in regard to this, she was not the “president of all women’s
issues.”
Not long after Trump’s election, John Oliver did a Last Week Tonight exposé warning people
that Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump would not
be the “moderating” influences on Trump’s far-right agenda that they’d hoped
they would be, and this has clearly been the case even in regard to a DACA
compromise. Ivanka has been allowed by the media to claim that she “opposes” the
child separation policy, but this is clearly a lie. How do we know this is a
lie? This is what she went on to say in her Face
the Nation interview:
I think everyone should be engaged. And the full force of the U.S.
government is... is committed to this effort to border security, to protecting
the most vulnerable. That includes those being trafficked across our border,
which this president has committed to countering and combating human
trafficking in an incredibly comprehensive, aggressive way.
This is precisely the hypocritical
talking point that the Trump administration has been using to “justify” family
separation and caging children in concentration camps. Children being brought
into the country with their parents are being “trafficked,” and putting them in
cages is “protecting the vulnerable.” Ivanka in fact supports separating and caging children in concentration camps.
Caging children is what the Trump administration via Ivanka Trump’s own mouth is calling “countering and
combating human trafficking.” These children are trying to escape to a better
future like all immigrants to the U.S., but according to Ivanka doublespeak,
they are just being “trafficked” across the border.
These are Trump’s “senior
advisors”: racists, do-nothings and liars. And we are supposed to be
“surprised” by the crimes of this administration?
No comments:
Post a Comment