Who is the more patriotic and
loyal to the ideals of this country? Soldiers who abide by the rules of war as
enunciated by the Geneva Convention, or those who murder unarmed civilians or
prisoners? This country hasn’t erased the shame of the My Lai massacre more
than 50 years ago, in which 500 unarmed Vietnamese civilians were killed by an
Army platoon on the orders of Lt. William Calley; then as now there was wide
disagreement over whether such action was a crime or not depending on your
political leanings; naturally those on the right saw Calley as “unjustly”
crucified. By the way, the U.S. is not a signatory of
Protocol II of the Convention, which prohibits torture and “outrages on
personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment.”
But Donald Trump would have us
believe that soldiers and sailors who are convicted or charged war criminals
are more “patriotic” and loyal to the ideals this country allegedly stands for
than the vast majority who did fight “by the rules.” That is just like Trump,
who never plays by or respects civilized norms of behavior. The Navy has such a
rigorous standard of discipline for Seals that it removed the Trident pins from
150 since 2011; Trump refused to allow the review process to go forward to see
if Edward Gallagher should be allowed to keep his, and if Gallagher himself
respected the code of discipline for Seals, he would not have gone on Fox News
and whined about his predicament, but removed the pin himself. Oh, and by the
way, one of those being charged with the hazing/murder of Green Beret SSG Logan
Melgar is a Navy Seal; before Melgar was strangled to death, one of those
involved admitted that they also intended to sexually assault him. Why? Because they felt he had "disrespected" them and was critical of their "juvenile" behavior.
Instead, Trump wants Gallagher
and the rest of his storm trooping
“warfighters” to go out and campaign for him as a return “favor.” Who are the
kind of people who don’t buy in on the principles this country fought a war of
independence and a civil war for? USA
Today quotes an unnamed retired senior naval officer: “The larger issue for
me is this ‘cable Cabinet’ at Fox News that seems to be able to unilaterally
convince the president on issues they care about. He should be held
accountable. But what do you do about Fox News? Who holds them to account for
advising defense and foreign policy?” Trump often has taken a keen interest to
Fox News’ latest far-right “cause celebre,” and Gallagher and his fellow war
criminals were feted to such interest.
While the Trump Justice
Department is ignoring thousands of clemency requests that have legitimate
claims, Trump prefers to act on those cases in which he can benefit
politically. USA Today quotes a law
professor who notes that “He is doing it to reward political supporters to
benefit those who would benefit him politically. What he is doing is serving up
red meat to the base.” In other words, Trump and his Fox News-watching “base”
don’t really have any moral or ethical “principles”; whatever issue that Fox
News or far-right commentators like Ann Coulter suddenly decide has too much
support from mainstream or “liberal” media, it is fair game for alternate
universe “interpretation.”
Note that Fox News likes to push
the latest Ukraine conspiracy theories, and Venezuela is also a frequent target, mainly because its current
government is considered “socialist.” But corrupt governments exist everywhere,
including in this White House. Talking about corruption in Russia, where
corruption is a way of life, is a non-starter because Trump likes Russia and is
particularly fond of its current dictator, Vladimir Putin. During last week’s
impeachment hearings, we heard a lot from Donald Trump and his Republican
familiars about the “disloyalty” to America by Ukrainian-Americans Marie
Yovanovitch, the ousted ambassador to Ukraine, and Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman,
an NSC official who was the first to come out publically concerning Trump’s
July 25 phone call to the Ukrainian president in which he “asked” for an
investigation of the Bidens. But why are the people who are allowing Russia to
undermine American interests not considered the real “disloyal” and
“unpatriotic” characters in this country? Because for Trump, Republicans and
100 million supporters in this country for whom words like “loyalty’ and
“patriotism” are nothing more than code words and dog whistles for “America
First” fascism and white nationalism?
Let us remember that although the
Mueller investigation claimed to have found no hard evidence that anyone in the
Trump campaign “colluded” directly with Russian officials, there are
outstanding indictments against three Russians companies and 25 total Russian
operatives for interfering with the 2016 election on behalf of Trump, and that
Julian Assange very likely received his Democratic email dumps from the
Russians. The Roger Stone trial suggests that the Trump campaign did through a
roundabout way collude with the Russians, and in any case the Mueller report
stated that the principle reason why no collusion case could be made was that
those interviewed either gave false testimony, or refused to talk. As we
discovered this past summer, as soon as Robert Mueller in his public testimony
refused to clear-up the collusion angle, Trump made his infamous July 25 phone
call in which he basically asked the Ukrainian president to “collude” with him in
investigating the Bidens. The difference here was that unlike the Mueller
investigation, this time Trump was caught red-handed, and that there were
public servants who were willing to tell the truth. Those people were the true
“patriots.”
Trump’s claim that he is only
interested in rooting out “corruption” is as blatantly a lie as they get.
First, the claims against the Bidens have thus far proven to be mere conspiracy
theories first pushed by disgruntled Ukrainian officials ousted from power, and
then picked up by the far-right media here; even the original “sources” of
those conspiracies have now admitted that there was nothing to them. Secondly,
Trump is only interested in the undermining Joe Biden, not against corruption
as a concept. As long as polls suggest that Biden will be his principle
obstacle to reelection, he will keep pushing this con until another “frontrunner”
emerges to threaten him.
As noted, Trump has shown no
interest in “investigating” the corruption of other countries engaged in much
worse—including that of Putin. “Officially” Putin’s presidential salary is
$133,000 a year, and he lives in a “small” apartment. Yet Forbes
suspects he may be the richest man in world, which is the only explanation for
how he can own a brand new $1 billion palace and a $500 million yacht—and those
are just the more expensive ones he owns. He also allegedly “owns” 58 airplanes.
From once a lowly KGB agent with no apparent business acumen, estimates of
Putin’s wealth now range from $70 billion to $200 billion. It also has been
claimed that he has $40 billion stashed in a Swiss bank account.
How did he manage to “buy” all of
this on his government “salary”? Maybe like Major Healey he stole Jeannie from
Major Nelson for a while and got carried away, unable to explain how he could
live in a mansion with servants and owned a yacht on his astronaut
salary—except that, of course, in a country as corrupt as Russia is, Putin is the
“genie” of corruption, and he is never required to explain himself. It is
probable that Putin helped himself both to the nation’s treasury, and extorted
a “price” from major Russian companies, principally in the energy sector, for
“favors” he was in a position to give. Like any head of a criminal
organization, Putin could and did “punish” those who refused to contribute to
his “kitty” fund—and have assassinated journalists who tried to expose his
corruption. What would Trump say about all of this? Well, naturally he would be
“impressed,” and wished he could fleece the government coffers (like he tried
with the G7 meeting) and extort “favors” if he could.
The level of corruption that
Trump has introduced into government has not been seen since the Warren G.
Harding administration. And it is not just of a political nature but of a moral
and ethical nature. Policy seems never to be evaluated by its human cost, but
by its “cost” to Trump. The passage of the Affordable Care Act cost the
Democrats dear in the 2010 midterms, but there was no denying that Democrats
had the well-being of the people in mind. Nothing Trump has done has been for
the benefit of the country as a whole. As mentioned yesterday, his tax cut for
corporations has not only not had a positive effect on the economy, but
potentially may leave the country unable to right itself because the federal
deficit is already at levels which would be expected if the government was
infusing money into the economy to combat the effects of a major economic
downturn. The UN’s report on climate change now says that unless drastic
measures are done now, there will be no hope for the planet; what has Trump
done to “combat” this global as well as national emergency? He rescinded Obama
era regulations that led to yearly reductions in total CO2 emissions; in the
past year, CO2 emissions have increased 2.7 percent in the U.S. But that isn’t
the “worst” of it: Trump has managed to so divide this country into warring
factions with his ignorant, inhuman behavior and pronouncements that have been
transformed into literal “policy,” the “justification” of which appeals to the
lowest, most “instinctual” element of the bigot’s psyche. Taking into
consideration the humanity of others is no longer a part of the national
dialogue.
The tentacles of Trump’s
corruption have spread far and wide with the help of his familiars. Rudy
Giuliani is perhaps the most notorious, with revelations that he not only is
the most conspicuous of the conspirators, but apparently he has been enriching
himself by providing “legal” advice to some shady characters. Lev Parnas and
Igor Fruman, who are currently under arrest for laundering foreign money into
Republican campaign accounts, have close ties with Giuliani, and Parnas claims
to have assisted Giuliani with digging up “dirt” on the Bidens—which of course
constitutes “collusion” with foreign entities. The other day the Wall Street Journal reported more
federal subpoenas were issued to confederates of Giuliani: among the potential
charges: obstruction of justice, money laundering, conspiracy to defraud the
United States, making false statements to the federal government, serving as an
agent of a foreign government without registering with the Justice Department,
donating funds from foreign nationals, making contributions in the name of
another person or allowing someone else to use one’s name to make a
contribution, along with mail fraud and wire fraud.
Parnas has also accused Rep.
Devin Nunes and his representatives of seeking assistance from foreign entities
in domestic political dirt gathering operations. Many in Congress and the media
are mystified by the fact that Nunes “stupidly” keeps bringing the fact of
Russian interference into the picture even as he tries to deny it as a “hoax.” And
while Jeff Sessions left his familiar, Stephen Miller, to carry on his racist
anti-immigrant fight in the White House, so too apparently has Nunes, whose
protégé Kash Patek was accused by Fiona Hill as misrepresenting himself to
Trump as the “go-to” source for NSC opinion on Russian and Ukrainian
intelligence. Patek has very likely been feeding Trump the various conspiracy
theories in regard to the Bidens and alleged Ukraine “interference” against
Trump that Nunes has been pushing during the impeachment hearings.
But does any of this “matter”?
You have one-term Republican congressman Allen West, the senior advisor to the
CREEP-like Committee to Defend the
President and Fox News’ Laura Ingraham quoting one of MSN News “pop quiz” polls
to chide Democrats “I told you so” that the American people don’t care
about impeaching Trump. This man is so patently unfit to be president that
nobody “cares” except the “fake news” media? As Adam Serwer of the Atlantic Monthly is pointing out, “Trumpists
are not operating from an ethical framework that even allows acknowledgment
that the president is capable of being guilty. Trump is the nation, and the
nation cannot commit treason against itself. On the contrary, it is Joe Biden
who is guilty of betrayal, defying the tribune of the people by seeking to run
against him, and it is Trump’s treacherous staff who convict themselves of
treason with every statement that implicates the president. The more evidence
of Trump’s misdeeds the Democrats uncover, the more they reveal themselves as
traitors. For Trumpists, there is no higher patriotism than bending to Trump’s
will, and no more base corruption than defying it.”
For those who simply do not care,
Serwer would remind us that we “should not lose sight of why the president is
being impeached, and it is not because of a good-faith dispute over Ukraine
policy. Trump and his advisers conspired to rig the 2020 election on his
behalf, scheming to defraud the American people of a free and fair election. A
genuine republic cannot survive chief executives who utilize their powers to
make anyone who might challenge their authority into a criminal by extorting
weaker entities into leveling false charges at their political rivals. Indeed,
the republic’s Founders foresaw such a circumstance, and created the
impeachment clause as a last resort against it. The high crime that the
president has committed is not against Ukraine, but against America.”
No comments:
Post a Comment