Hypocrisy in this
country is currently being practiced at an all-time high (or is that an all-time
low) in this country. While Gloria Allred seems hell-bent on proving the
accusation that self-obsessed white feminists are as much racists as they are
misandrists, she has been curiously reticent about upsetting Donald Trump;
perhaps as Trump has a “handshake” deal with Vladimir Putin, Allred (who
recently backed out of a case involving a client with a complaint against Trump),
has an unspoken “agreement” to avoid a “tit-for-tat” twitter war with Trump. Or
maybe she is just an ambulance-chasing media hound who is too cowardly to stand
the “heat.” As for Mr. Hypocrisy himself, I received an uninvited guest in my
inbox, mainly Trump’s 2020 campaign bullshit. It is clear that Trump hopes that
fanning the flames of racism will be his winning ticket. Here is what passes
for a “poll” question:
· Which issue(s) concern you the most at our
border? (Select as many as apply)
- Drug Trafficking
- Criminals
- MS-13 Gang Members
- Sex Trafficking
- Illegal Aliens
- Terrorists
- All of the Above
Notice there is no
“none of the above.” You can tell that this is aimed at the Pat Buchanan and
Ann Coulter types. This is ugly stereotyping of the worst kind. Michael Daly of
the Daily Beast notes that the “El Chapo” trial has exposed the truck-sized
holes in Trump’s claims of how drugs are getting into this country (much of it
still “manufactured” in Colombia). As Trump manufactures a “crisis” on the
southern border completely ignorant of the reality of life for the vast
majority of would-be immigrants, Daly can’t help but note the hypocrisy of
telling lies while reality lies dormant: “Homicides are up 40 per
cent in Washington, D.C., where Trump gave his big speech about the supposed
border crisis. Nobody is suggesting that
undocumented aliens are a significant factor in our capital’s murder rate.
Our president therefore has not mentioned the carnage even as it rages in the
streets of the city where he now lives and works and addresses the nation.”
But hypocrisy gets
a whole new meaning when it comes to the media’s treatment of the problem of
pedophile priests and nuns. Discussions
of gay priests is fraught with such hypocrisy, largely because the LGBT community
is seen as “victims” of society and they don’t need any bad publicity. A Washington Post article recently opined
that in regard to the Catholic Church’s priest problem, “The problem is abuse of power, an abuse that happens as a result of homophobia
that keeps gay men in the closet.” Huh? Look,
pedophilia is a crime no matter what the rationalization, consensual sexual
activity with an adult is not. The
writer of this mendacious piece would have us believe that in this day and age
when LGBT issues are generally treated at least in the media with righteous (or
self-righteous) empathy, that some gay men, fearful of being “exposed” as gay,
choose to join the priesthood because they have no other “choice.” Choice to do
what? Have sex with young boys because having sex with grown men is too
“risky”?
And now we are finding out that
the priesthood isn’t the only segment of the Church with “problems.” Joelle Casteix of Rewire News claims the Catholic Church
doesn’t have a “gay priest” problem because, well, she doesn’t exactly say. Girls
are usually not victims of priests, and that means what? Not sure, but
apparently Casteix is not aware of the Scottish orphanage case where 11 nuns
were arrested this past summer for abusing their charges, including sexually,
nor is she aware of charges being made against American nuns. According to CBS
News in the past month, one alleged victim claimed that a Sister Eileen Shaw “groomed”
her for having sex with women (mainly with herself) since the age of five. Another former nun who claims to
have been abused by her superior reported that 18 women have contacted her
about being sexually abused by nuns. It is also wrong to assume that this is a
“new” issue: in a 2006 edition of the William
& Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice it was reported that
the problem of pedophile nuns could be much worse than assumed, and that
The danger of underreporting
may only be increased when the abuser is female rather than male, and increased
still further when the abuser is a nun. Nuns, as stated earlier, tend to take
charge of children more often than priests, and their position of authority may
intimidate children into silence. This position may even cause children to
justify the abuse as a "normal" aspect of the clergy-women's
authority.
Of course we could open up
another can of worms concerning the under-reporting (or over-ignoring) of
domestic violence in which women are the perpetrators. But getting back to the
subject at hand, the study noted that sexual abuse committed by women has often
been “explained” by their own alleged history of abuse as children, but it
found very little evidence of a direct connection in the population as whole
between being abused “naturally” leading to being abusive, even for females.
To be fair, only a very small
fraction of priests (and nuns) have been accused of same-sex pedophilia, but sweeping
the issue under the rug and pretending that it is a different problem than what
it actually is will not “solve” the problem of pedophilia in the Church, nor
will clinging to “tradition.” Not only does the Church decline to even
acknowledge the “gay” issue as a matter of “traditional” values, it still
clings to the “tradition” that since Jesus was never married and was apparently
celibate that priests must do the same because they are his “representative” on
earth. In the absence a major policy shifts the only thing the Church can do is
to engage in extensive psychological examinations of potential priests (and
nuns). That this is apparently not done is of course due to the fact that in a
country where religion is becoming less and less a factor people’s daily lives
(let alone on Sunday) the priesthood is no longer considered to be a “plum”
job. In the film Saturday Night Fever
Tony comes home to a room full of family in a state of shock; their “good” son,
the pride of the family for becoming a priest, was upstairs. Tony finds his
brother and asks him what he said to them, it looks like someone died. His
brother tells him that he quit the priesthood; he only became one to please
their parents, but it just wasn’t for him.
Has the Catholic Church, in desperation,
just taken anyone who graduates from the seminary? For all the accusations that
the Church is “anti-gay,” people do have choices, like joining another church
or simply giving up religion altogether. Instead, some are choosing not just to
remain in the Church, but bring the worst kind disrepute upon it to satisfy
physical desires in “secret.” That the media and the Pope and his minions on
down have not publicly confronted the embarrassing problem of not just priests
but now nuns who have not foresworn their sexual appetites (whether for same-sex
“partners” or not) and feel the Church is a “safe haven” for this behavior—is
indeed ironic in the face of accusations that the Catholic Church is
“anti-gay.”
No comments:
Post a Comment