In their 27-24 loss to the
Seahawks, the Packers once again snatched defeat from the jaws of victory, and
they did it on multiple levels. Special teams, of course, contributed with a
penalty nullifying a 55-yard punt return, and even a 67-yard punt was kicked
line-drive right into the end zone for a touchback. As I tried to point out
last time, Aaron Jones might have had some long gains that inflated his rushing
numbers against Miami, but on a majority of his rushes he tended to be less
than productive; against the Seahawks he had just 40 yards on 11 carries. If he
was stopped early and often, the Packer ground game would be a non-factor, and
it was against the Seahawks. The Packer defense, once more, failed to make the
critical stops in the fourth quarter.
And Aaron Rodgers, despite making
some nice throws downfield and putting up numbers that looked good on paper,
was surprisingly inert at certain points in the game and especially at the end.
As Troy Aikman pointed out repeatedly, Rodgers was either making poor throws
(like the hair-pulling short-hop on third-and-two on what would be their last
possession), was not seeing open receivers right in front of him, hung on to
the ball too long leading to sacks, was tentative when he had a wide open field
in front of him, only running after the hole closed. He couldn’t blame his
receivers, especially rookie Equanimeous St. Brown, who
had to do a “Rubberband Man” stretch to catch the only catchable ball thrown
his way.
But the biggest
gripe has to be reserved for Coach Mike McCarthy. With the Packers up 24-20 and
the Seahawks on the 50-yard line with just under 7 minutes to play, Russell
Wilson threw a pass to Tyler Lockett that was clearly juggled and the ball
touching the ground before he had possession. Why the official didn’t call it
incomplete was likely because he was a coward and wanted someone else to make
the call at that critical moment, expecting his “complete” call it to be
overturned. When asked, former head of officiating and analyst Mike Pereia did
not hesitate in calling it an incomplete pass. The non-catch was shown several
times in replay during the remainder of the game.
The
question, of course, is why McCarthy did not challenge the call, which ended-up
being a 34-yard play and aided the drive that ended in the Seahawks scoring the
winning touchdown. McCarthy was given the benefit of the doubt by Joe Buck and
Aikman, provided the “explanation” that he wanted to conserve the Packers final
timeout, despite the fact that there was plenty of time on the clock even if
the Seahawks did end-up scoring a touchdown. But that was hindsight, and they
could have been held to a field goal. It was so obvious that the completion
call would have been overturned one has to wonder who was McCarthy’s “eyes” on
the play who should have advised him to challenge the call. Was he advised to
do so, and did he reject the recommendation it because he wasn’t “sure”?
There has
been a lot of talk about McCarthy’s play-calling, clock management and
bone-head decisions like this one that helped cost the team the game. Too often
he has counted on Rodgers to bail him out, and we have seen this season that
Rodgers can’t be counted on to do so on every occasion. Is the addition of this
going to sufficient to be the final nails in the coffin of McCarthy’s tenure in
Green Bay after 13 years with two Hall of Fame quarterbacks and only one Super
Bowl appearance to show for it?
No comments:
Post a Comment