The media styled the recent Virginia
governor’s race as a “culture war,” insofar as how Donald Trump defines it, and
naturally plays the race card to the hilt. The morning of the election, he
tweeted “EdWGillespie will totally turn around the high crime and poor economic
performance of VA. MS-13 and crime will be gone.” And then “Ralph Northam will
allow crime to be rampant in Virginia. He’s weak on crime, weak on our GREAT
VETS. Anti-Second Amendment and has been horrible n Virginia economy.” A
Gillespie campaign ad again made an effort to tie Northam with the MS-13 gang
and “sanctuary cities” for “violent” Hispanic “criminals.”
All this racist nonsense from the
master of “fake news” was to stoke the fear of whites by defining Hispanic
“culture” as one of criminality and violence (recall during the campaign that
he only suggested that “some” immigrants from Mexico were not violent rapists).
Yet even the MS-13 gang stereotyping suffers from the usual fallacies; violent,
yes, but they are small in number compared to “homegrown” gangs, and like all
such affiliations their victims tend not to be white people at all, but members
of other gangs; most white people are still victimized by members of their own
race—they just act “indignant” if they are the victim of someone other than another
white person. It was also pointed out that there are no “sanctuary cities” in
Virginia; furthermore, unlike Trump and his alleged “bone spur,” Northam did
his duty and served in the military.
Meanwhile, a Latino political
group paid for their own television spot, featuring a Confederate-flag waving Gillespie
supporter trying to run down a group of immigrant children, no doubt a reminder
of what had happened in Charlottesville. It is hard to say exactly what impact this
had on the vote itself, but it does appear that the white “America First” crowd
was “upset” that anyone should so harshly judge their motivations; one should
note that it seems “acceptable” to apply all manner of ugly racist stereotypes
onto Hispanics without being called out on it; I recall an incident at a work
location that a white person was telling “jokes” about “Mexicans” in front of a
group white and black co-workers; I alone spoke out about the racism of his “jokes,”
and his response was that “nobody else thinks that they are racist.” I retorted that I thought they were racist, after which fear that I might speak to
a supervisor shut him up. It is interesting to note that Hispanics (in the
media or even on the street) apparently have no right to respond with a
narrative that is not merely told about them—one that includes the Thornton
shooting, that despite all the evidence no one wants to admit that it was hate
crime targeting Hispanics.
Instead of facing the dark place
within themselves, those more tuned into Trump could be expected to respond to
his white “America First” message (undermined recently by his lapdog antics
with China and Putin during his Asian trip), and many of them had the audacity
to be “insulted” by the accusation of overt racial hostility in the Latino ad. Still,
many voters were apparently equally disgusted with the racism that Trump and
then Gillespie injected into the campaign; one voter who decided on Northam
bemusingly professed not to “realize” that Northam was a member of the MS-13 gang,
and exit polls suggested that many college-educated suburbanites were off-put
by Trump’s attempt to put them on his sewer-level.
After Northam’s victory, Trump proclaimed
that it was due to the fact that Gillespie had not “fully” embraced his
race-baiting tactics, which again was not true; the reality was that Trump’s
“intervention” turned-off more voters than it “turn-on.” Still, it was a close
call, and one can find examples in everyday life how close it can be; the other
day I encountered an office-type white female walking in the opposite direction
and who “smiled” at me in that self-conscious way, yet in almost the same
instant her hand gravitated to her handbag to check if it was “still there.”
Which action was her more “genuine” response? We only need to observe Trump’s
ever changing responses to the Charlottesville incident to know the answer to
that.
You’d be amazed by how much “interest” my presence in the building excites—and it’s not necessarily from security and the building management. They usually spring into “action” after getting a call from some bigoted employee offended by the sight of me, who is certain I don’t “belong” there. I always wear what could be termed “office casual” attire; I have been told that if I wore clothing more suitable to a lowly position, there would be less confusion and hostility about my “place,” just to "confirm" their own in their conceit. Is this a racist construct? Only those wallowing in their own mendacity can doubt it.
You’d be amazed by how much “interest” my presence in the building excites—and it’s not necessarily from security and the building management. They usually spring into “action” after getting a call from some bigoted employee offended by the sight of me, who is certain I don’t “belong” there. I always wear what could be termed “office casual” attire; I have been told that if I wore clothing more suitable to a lowly position, there would be less confusion and hostility about my “place,” just to "confirm" their own in their conceit. Is this a racist construct? Only those wallowing in their own mendacity can doubt it.
While the election may be over the
“culture war” continues, although behind the scenes not exactly in the way that
bigots and nativists like Trump, Ann Coulter and Pat Buchanan who believe that
Hispanics are out to “destroy America” think. Most Hispanics are not “white” in
the Anglo sense of the word, but have varying degrees of indigenous people
ancestry—which ironically makes them more “American” than either whites or
blacks in this part of world. Nevertheless those who tend to believe so do so
for another ironic reason—that they feel more culturally attuned to white America, which is a fair assumption to
make since Spanish culture is European
in origin just as the “Anglo” culture is, just with a different “flavor.” Apparently not pleasing to certain people; I observed that the "taco day" that an insurance company in the building I work in was not exactly the "cultural exchange" and effort to show racial harmony it purported to be; everyone was eager to bring a piece of the puzzle, but hardly anyone was willing to "partake." It appeared to me that about 90 percent of the food was thrown out; even the people who brought it were unwilling to take it home with them and be forced to eat it themselves. What hypocrisy.
Thus the so-called “culture war”
seems dependent more on white racial identity rather than actual cultural
assimilation. I recall that when I was attending a college located in a former
Confederate state, I was listening to favorite hit songs from the 70s collected
on a cassette tape, and a blonde-haired student sneered “That isn’t your music.” He meant, of course, that
“my people” didn’t create this music, whoever “my people” were. Of course you
could say the same thing about people who are not black who “enjoy” rap and hip-hop
music—especially since most white kids typically do not derive from the
“culture” from which such music is spawned. The reality is that culture is not
the “property” of any particular group of people, but to the individual who
lives by it.
One other curious item in regard
to “cultural racism” is how it is on display in “subtle” ways by women of
color. I recall encountering during my itinerant temp days a black female who
tried to “doll” up her looks as Caucasian as possible, pick out a summer job white
kid who looked like he was from a “nice” family and college material, and cling
to him like a wet rag; it made me sick to see that. I could tell the target was
uncomfortable with it (I suspected he probably had a blonde Barbie Doll
girlfriend already). That attempt apparently failed, because the next time I
saw her at another job site she was attempting even more desperately to seduce
another young white male of “good” stock.
Many “Americanized” Hispanic women are
much the same, hoping to achieve bought social status (I wonder what they have
to “sell”); in the 2006 film Ask the Dust
based on the John Fante novel, the would-be Italian-American novelist is told
by a Mexican woman with whom he has a turbulent relationship with that she
would prefer to marry the Anglo man whose surname is ironically “White,” rather
than someone whose name (Bandini) is barely “better” than her own; her one goal
in life was to “improve” her social status by marrying “white.” All of this is
a racist “statement” because it implies an acceptance of racist stereotypes, especially
that held against their men; one might recall Lorena Bobbitt, a Hispanic woman from
Ecuador who married her “dream” white man. Some of us remember the media circus
surrounding how that ended.
No comments:
Post a Comment