The recent decision by the Army
Corps of Engineers to suspend completion of the Dakota Access pipeline in the
face of protests from Sioux Indians and environmentalists is, of course, too
little and too late. The pipeline is nearly finished, with the “hold-up” being whether
to build a pipe across the Missouri River, and Donald Trump is waiting in the
wings to undo the move. The Corps decided on the delay with the rationalization
that it had not done an environmental review for the 1,170 mile project. You
mean they had not done an environmental impact review before they even began
the project? The administration previously relied on the “good faith” of the
pipeline’s builders to insure that it was environmentally safe. One should note
that the Sioux Indians do have a legitimate complaint; the pipeline originally
was supposed to have passed well east of “unceded” Sioux land, but mostly white
Bismarck was “outraged” by the potential for water quality impacts, so the
pipeline was diverted west of the city into Sioux land without any prior
discussion, since the complaints of whites have greater “weight.”
Since this will likely be a Pyrrhic
victory for the Sioux and environmentalists, what interested me was an image
supplied by one of the news outlets, showing a white man on the near end of a
bridge, and a Sioux Indian on the far end, with this caption:
U.S. Navy veteran John Gutekanst from
Athens, Ohio, waves an American flag as an activist approaches the police
barricade with his hands up on a bridge near Oceti Sakowin Camp.
Why did this
interest me? Because I am “fascinated” by what motivates people to go around
waving the flag. The other day I saw someone in a pickup truck with a regulation-size
flag raised from the cab. Why this “in-your-face” display of phony “patriotism”?
And I do mean phony, because it really has nothing to do with “patriotism,” but
nationalism, nativism and xenophobia. Why does this navy veteran in the picture
think he is “special” merely because he is white? Is he denying that Native Americans have rights because they are not "Americans" by his definition? Does it mean anything to him
that 11 percent of combat deaths in the so-called “Iraqi Freedom” war were
Hispanic, in line with their proportion of the population? No, it doesn’t even
register in his mind because they are the “enemy” on the “home front.”
The media
continually portrays current military “heroes” as solely white (including women,
who constituted .025 percent of the U.S. deaths in Iraq, 90 percent from
non-combat-related “accidents”), giving the public the impression that only
whites fought and died for “our freedom.” This allows white nationalists and
white supremacist types to go around pretending that only they represent what
the flag “means” because they are the only ones fighting for the “freedom” it represents.
Of course,
what “freedom” and “patriotism” means is the question. Does the flag “represent”
the freedom as expressed in the Declaration of Independence?: We hold
these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are
endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. Some may argue about the “created equal” part if that means something
other than the strictly physiological, but all the rest of it is not open to “debate”—it
applies to all, regardless of race, “ethnicity” or religion.
Thus these bigots waving the flag do not actually believe in what the
flag stands for. I mentioned here an incident where I was listening to an older
white female expressing her nativism and racism, which forced me to cut-in on
her harangue; she told me to go serve this country, to which I informed her
that I did serve seven years in the Army; what about her? She fumbled and
stumbled before telling me to “go back in” and something about “serving her
country” by being a nurse. This was just more evidence of the ignorance and self-serving
stereotyping by white people who see themselves as the only “legitimate”
Americans, and those who exist outside their sphere of privilege and
entitlement have no rights that they should be forced to respect.
I am as “proud” to be an American as anyone in this country. But the
reality is that I feel like a foreigner in my own country by all these flag
waivers, because I know that I am excluded from the world they envision that
flag represents. It doesn’t matter that I am as “American” as any American who
is white; “they” are the “creators,” and they have the “right” to decide who or
who isn’t included or excluded by the rights embodied by the flag. But who has
the right to make that decision? The flag isn’t making that decision, but
people who are desecrating it by the very act of forcing it to “represent”
their hate and bigotry.
No comments:
Post a Comment