Are Donald Trump’s denials that
he inappropriately “groped” and kissed the women who are now coming out of the
woodwork to be believed? Trump has already intimated that he engaged in such
acts, in the belief that women thought that it was “OK” because of his celebrity.
That might be a stretch, but one can understand his “outrage” that the media
would be coming out with these claims that in his opinion are “misrepresentations”
and fabrications. Meanwhile, the media is deriding his claim that Hillary
Clinton is behind all of this, but I pointed out a few days ago that you don’t
have to be Adolf Hitler to have your faithful underlings do all your dirty work
while leaving behind no paper trail leading to you; all you need is a
propaganda ministry masquerading as an “objective” news media, and mindless
zealots who will fall on a sword for you.
It certainly isn’t a “stretch” to
suggest that because the election polls were too close to “call” that the media
would be completely ignoring the “issues” and instead engage in relentless
attacks on Trump’s character. Yet the person whose “character” is most
troubling has always been Hillary Clinton’s. I would prefer someone to ask why
we would want someone in office whose pathological lying goes to the most
bizarre extremes: Clinton has claimed that she was named after Sir Edmund
Hillary, who along with his Sherpa guide Tenzing Norgay “conquered” Mount
Everest in 1953. The problem with that claim is that it is an obvious lie; Clinton
was born in 1947, long before the New Zealander became well-known for his
exploit.
Last year in an article in
RealClearPolitics written by Larry Elder (who I would describe as a
moderate-to-conservative commentator rather than a right-wing extremist), it was
noted that while Bill Cosby’s sexual assault allegations were the stuff of
yellow journalism—and Elder could have questioned the media’s fascination with black athletes and celebrities accused
of sex crimes and domestic violence—he wondered why the Clintons continue to
still get a “pass” on similar accusations:
Why does
Bill Clinton continue to get a pass? Clinton was, after all, accused of rape by
Juanita Broaddrick. Broaddrick, on "Dateline NBC," claimed that
Clinton, then-Arkansas attorney general and gubernatorial candidate, raped her:
"I first pushed him away. I just told him 'no.' ... He tries to kiss me
again. He starts biting on my lip. ... And then he forced me down on the bed. I
just was very frightened. I tried to get away from him. I told him 'no.' ... He
wouldn't listen to me."
Hillary Clinton, who knew all about her husband’s
dalliances, and apparently was “accepting” of them because of her own appetite
for a certain type of sexual “dalliance” for which Bill looked the other way as
well, responded to Broaddrick’s accusation in the expected way:
She further
alleges that Hillary Clinton, shortly after the alleged rape, verbally
intimidated her, implying that Broaddrick better keep her mouth shut -- or
else. At a political event two weeks later, Broaddrick claims that Hillary
approached her: "She came over to me, took ahold of my hand and said,
'I've heard so much about you and I've been dying to meet you. ... I just want
you to know how much that Bill and I appreciate what you do for him.' ...
"This
woman, this little, soft-spoken -- pardon me for the phrase -- dowdy woman that
would seem very unassertive, took ahold of my hand and squeezed it and said,
'Do you understand? Everything that you do.' I could have passed out at that
moment and I got my hand from hers and I left. ... She was just holding onto my
hand. Because I had started to turn away from her and she held onto my hand and
she said, 'Do you understand? Everything that you do,' I mean, cold chills went up my spine. That's the
first time I became afraid of that woman."
Elder also pointed out the
hypocrisy of feminists and other fanatical gender advocates who derided Bill’s
accusers, apparently more in support of maintaining Hillary’s future plans. He
notes that Hillary was the “ringleader” behind the "nuts or sluts"
strategy used to intimidate and marginalize Bill’s accusers.
Meanwhile…Michelle Obama is
calling out Trump for his "hurtful, hateful language about women,”
although this is clearly an overstatement and nothing like what is coming out
of the Clinton camp and the media directed at Trump. It is bemusing how many—even athletes—are denouncing
Trump’s “locker room” comparison with the comments he made years ago that were
clearly braggadocio. The Wells Report on the Ritchie Incognito/Jonathan Martin
“locker room” commentary makes Trump seem almost like a monk. Here are some
excerpts from the Wells Report:
The "you're my bitch" comments added to name-calling that had
begun in 2012, Martin's rookie season, when Incognito, Jerry and Pouncey began
regularly calling Martin a "cunt," a "bitch," a
"pussy" and a "faggot." Martin was not surprised to hear
these words used by football players, but believed they were frequently hurled
at him with demeaning intent. The evidence shows that these words -- at least
at times -- were spoken to Martin in a cutting tone or with the intent to
humiliate him. According to Martin, these types of taunts were a routine part
of his life with the Dolphins.
Martin’s sister was a frequent
target of these locker room taunts:
We are going to run train on your sister. She loves me. I'm going to
fuck her without a condom and cum in her cunt. Hey, Jmart's sister is in town.
Get the plastic sheets ready, she's a squirter. I'm going to bang the shit out
of her and spit on her and treat her like shit. Hear your sister has a
wolf-puss. A fat, hairy pussy.
The report also noted that there
were physical gestures that “simulated” what was meant by these comments:
Martin also recalled that the comments about his sister were sometimes
accompanied by obscene physical gestures. For example, he claimed that on the
practice field, Incognito, Jerry and Pouncey would call his sister a
"squirter" and then squirt water onto the field from their water
bottles, and that while engaged in certain warm-up stretching exercises, they
would simulate having sex with his sister. Incognito confirmed these allegations.
What is the point of exploring
these “old” stories? That those attacking Trump in self-righteous terms are hypocrites
of the worst order, plain and simple. Does this mean you should vote for Trump?
No, it just means you should not vote for someone as corrupt and deceitful as
Clinton.
No comments:
Post a Comment