Back in April, Filipino
presidential candidate Rodrigo Duterte was not only expected to apologize for but
withdraw as a candidate for an “off-hand” comment in regard to an incident
while mayor of Davao City, scene of a prison riot in 1989 where a dozen or so
missionaries were taken hostage—one of them, an Australian woman, was gang
raped. Duterte “joked” that although he was “angry” that it happened, he
apparently thought that the woman was too “beautiful” for a bunch of criminals,
and he should have had first crack at her. The media predictably expressed its
outrage, for anything to do with the real and alleged victimization of women
will always be the subject of outrage. But also causing “outrage” is Duterte
recent assertion that he believes that “corrupt” journalists “deserve” to be killed.
Of course, the media is made-up of alleged “journalists,” so of course this is
a dire matter to them as well.
The problem is that Duterte is
just taking a page out of Donald Trump’s playbook, and he has said a great many
things that the U.S. media has not taken as much interest in. Like Trump,
Duterte is an outrageous personality taken to making deplorable statements, and
he seemingly doesn’t give a damn what people think about them. It is all very
Trump-like, but also very Trump-like is the fact that his kind of deliberately inflammatory
statements seem to have a large fan base—so large, in fact, that he has just been
elected president of the Philippines by a landslide margin. Apparently there is
a significant crime problem in that country, which must explain why his promise
to “eradicate” crime in his first six months in office by killing 100,000 criminals
was not found to be overly disturbing. Perhaps voters thought it was all a bunch
of hot air, but bellicose language was a shot of “fresh air” for a country that
has seen more than its “fair share” of murders and assassinations--we might "hopefully" conjecture.
How he will go about his
vigilante killing spree, if indeed that is the plan? According to the UK The Guardian, “Outlining some of his
other plans for his war on crime, Duterte said he would give police special
forces shoot-to-kill orders and send them into the main jail in Manila where
prisoners run drug trafficking operations.” Sounds like a license to simple go
in prisons and shoot people down on whim—like they did during the war years in
Nazi Germany.
But criminals are not his only
targets. It is not just “corrupt” journalists who should be killed, but “He
also said he would enlist junior soldiers to kill corrupt top-ranking police
officers who were involved in the drug trade. ‘I will call the private from the
army and say: ’Shoot him’,’ Duterte said. He urged police not to wait until he
assumed the presidency, and start killing criminals immediately. ‘Now, now,’ he
urged them.” This might all merely be a threat to police involved in corruption
to shape up or face the “consequences”; I mean, they do have a court system
that upholds a “constitution” and civil rights, don’t they?
No comments:
Post a Comment