I happened to encounter a “secret
history” of the Ku Klux Klan on television this past weekend. What surprised me
more than anything is not that the modern Klan has morphed into offshoots like
the so-called “Patriot,” “Minuteman” and various “militia” movements, but the fact
that their spokespersons try to make their message of hate sound “reasonable.”
They are just speaking up for the “rights” of white people. It was like
something I heard said by a white male while I was in the Army; there was
something on the radio about Black History Month, and he wanted to know why
there wasn’t a “White History” month. I was the only one in area to hear it
(the coward), but I chose to respond to it: “Because every other month is
‘White History’ month."
I am tired of being asked to
consider things like this to be “isolated” cases, not indicative of the
attitude of the dominant society as a whole. An investigation by a U.S.
Attorney in California charged some San Francisco police officers with racial
bias, calling into questions the motivations behind 100,000 arrests for largely
petty crimes and likely fabricated evidence. Texts between the
officers—particularly from an officer named Ian Furminger, who looks like a
Nazi—painted an ugly picture:
“We got two blacks at my boys [sic] school and they are brother and
sister! There cause dad works for the school district and I am watching them
like hawks.” "Do you celebrate quanza at your school? Yeah we burn the
cross on the field! Then we celebrate Whitemas." "Those guys (black
cops) are pretty stupid! Ask some dumb ass questions you would expect from a
black rookie! Sorry if they are your buddies!" "The buffalo soldier
was asked why the Indians Wouldnt shoot
the niggers that found for the confederate They thought they were sacred
buffalo and not human." "I am leaving it like it is, painting KKK on
the sides and calling it a day!" "Cross burning lowers blood pressure!
I did the test myself!" "All niggers must fucking hang. Ask my 6 year
old what he thinks about Obama." "I hate to tell you this but my wife
friend is over with their kids and her husband is black! If [sic] is an
Attorney but should I be worried?...Get ur pocket gun. Keep it available in
case the monkey returns to his roots. Its not against the law to put an animal
down…Well said!"
Besides seeing how a six-year-old
learns how to be a racist, this kind of talk obviously isn’t “shocking” in
light of recent instances of police use of force abuses; but it would be wrong
to isolate the attitude of (some) police from the wider cesspool from which
many of them emerged. After all, they
have to “deal” personally with “those people”—if they are actually “people” in
their minds—that their bigoted family and friends hope to avoid being “forced”
to encounter whenever they step outside their “safe” homes and neighborhoods. These
are the people who do double-takes when they see you walking nearby, wondering
if their remembered to lock their car doors, or the ones who act as if you are
invisible, or the ones who give you the evil eye. One can ask if many police
officers are racist to begin with, why did they join the force knowing they
would have to “deal” with minorities? The answer, obviously, is no different
from white supremacists training for the next “race war.”
While the white media focuses on
the abuses of individual police--that is, when they are not acting as if in that relatively rare instance when a police officer is shot you'd think the president was assassinated--they don’t talk about the wider society from
which they sprung. Whenever there is an attack by a Muslim in this country,
there is the search for “links” with other groups. When a right-wing extremist
commits a domestic terrorist act, it’s always the “lone nut” theory; nobody examines
the ideology from which the act sprung, or the level of “secret” support it
received. Remember that massacre of 69 Norwegians attending a liberal party
youth camp in 2011? Are we really supposed to believe that the far-right
extremist killer was only acting for himself? He certainly didn’t believe so; Anders
Behring Breivik claimed that he acted out of “necessity,” and he was sentenced
to only 21 years in prison. The police were also accused of being “tardy” in
their response to the massacre while it was in progress.
What about the Oklahoma City
bombing? Timothy McVeigh, wanting to seen as a “martyr” to the “cause,” named
no names and sought to be executed immediately. But as his first attorney said,
the FBI in its initial investigation apparently followed orders to limit its
scope. “I think he clearly aggrandized his role, enlarged it, to cover for
others who were involved,” said Steve Jones. Those others” obviously included
McVeigh’s friends in the anti-government/white supremacist compound of Elohim
City.
In fact, the Associated Press
reported that “hotel receipts, a speeding ticket, prisoner interviews,
informant reports and phone records” indicated that "members of Elohim
City are involved either directly or indirectly through conspiracy...that members
who were present when McVeigh called were familiar with explosives and had made
a videotape three months before McVeigh struck vowing a war against the federal
government and promising a ‘courthouse massacre’”…that members of Elohim City
were “discussing bombing a federal building in Oklahoma.” An informant reported
from that members discussed inventing alibis for themselves for the day of the
bombing.
That no attempt was made to bring
this extremist group preparing for “war” to account is yet another mystery of
the allegedly “liberal” Clinton administration—you know, the one that made the
disastrous decision to allow the Glass-Steagall Act to lapse, leading to the
worst economic crisis this country has faced since the Great Depression, and
“worked” with a Republican Congress to fill the nation’s prisons with
non-violent offenders, and destroying lives in the process.
But that begs the question of why
we should be “surprised” by any of this. Sure, most people just want to get by
without anyone getting in the way. But it is also true that bigots and racists
prefer others to “dirty” their hands in protecting what is theirs by
“privilege.” Police don’t act in a social “vacuum”; we have seen too many
unjustified shootings declared to be “justified” when all-white inquest and
grand juries get ahold those cases. 62 percent of whites voted for Mitt Romney
in this past presidential election; a similar percentage voted for
Klansman/neo-Nazi David Duke for governor of Louisiana 25 year ago. What were
the people who voted for him thinking? They were “normal” people, right? I
would like such people to “explain” themselves. Although I’ll give racist white
women “credit” for being less likely to conceal their hate (as putrid and unadulterated
by reason as it is) through silence, for the rest, I would ask what are you
thinking, for example, when you give me the “evil eye”?
No comments:
Post a Comment