While polls show that most
Americans just want to get it all over with and achieve some kind of normalized
relations with Iran and Cuba, there are of course those who simply want to play
partisan politics by using bad relations with the two countries as scarecrows
to inflame a certain minority of voters (some of whom have no idea why). With
the White House approving a nuclear deal with Iran and removing Cuba from the
state-sponsored terrorist list, it seems finally that mistakes that have
poisoned relations with these countries for at least 60 years are being set
aside. Iran will continue to be a difficult matter, since “normalization” will
not occur until the “supreme beings” who are actually in charge there make a
180-degree about-face and start saying “nice” things about the United States;
35 years of brainwashing Iranians about the “Great Satan” cannot be washed away
at the flick of a switch.
A group of Republican deadbeats
with nothing else to do have already sent a threatening “open letter” to Iran’s
leaders, asserting that the proposed deal would be “dead on arrival” if the
party regained the White House in 2016. Nobody should ever accuse the
Republicans of forethought or vision, particularly when they are blinded by
hatred for Barack Obama (which no one should mistake as being anything but raw
meat for the racist element of its constituency). Fortunately, this threat can
only strengthen the hand of the moderate element of the Iranian regime for
acceptance of the proposed deal in Iran, since its passage there is far from
certain, given opposition to it by the radical element. If Iran was smart, it
would approve the deal sooner rather than later; by January, 2017 the deal
would essentially be a fait accompli—particularly if Iran actually abides by
its conditions.
As for Cuba, the continuing
opposition to normalizing relations seems hypocritical, given the fact we have
“normal” relations with China, Russia and other former enemies that can hardly
be called paragons of freedom; toward Cuba, the U.S. has been acting like the cowardly playground bully who picks on the little guy. Current opposition seems to be knee-jerk in
nature, as if Cuba is the disinherited black sheep of the “family.” It is time
for the older class of Cuban-Americans—hardly paragons of virtue themselves, given
the oppressive Batista regime that once supported their privileged “freedom” against
the impoverished masses—to end being an affront against common sense, or be
ignored as an anachronism of the Cold War. They are part of the problem, not
the solution.
It is interesting to note that
none of the Obama administration’s apparent diplomatic triumphs—if we can call
them that—occurred during the regime of Hillary Clinton, who can count exactly
zero on her State Department resume. One suspects—given her closeness with
political reactionaries like Benjamin Netanyahu—that she was more an obstacle
than a facilitator of major policy initiatives, and was primarily focused on
her own private agenda. Why did she feel she needed to keep a tight fist on her
email communications by keeping them on personal server? Given her easily
excited personal enmity, one can imagine what the deleted missives revealed.
At any rate, Clinton only has the
Benghazi disaster as the most memorable “accomplishment” of her tenure at
State, and no doubt now that she has announced her intention to run for
president again, there can hardly be doubt that this incongruity between then
and now will be brought to the forefront.
No comments:
Post a Comment