Indiana has passed a so-called “religious
freedom” law, which allows people who are “uncomfortable” being around certain “types”
to use their “religious beliefs” as an excuse to deny employment or provide
services to people they harbor prejudices against. About a dozen other states
are considering such a law. Many people are claiming that this is an “anti-gay”
law, but those who fall under its net goes well beyond that. This law opens up
a Pandora's Box of legalized discrimination, without actually claiming it is
so. If you are subtly being discriminated against, all you have to do is
complain about it, and be accused of being a "troublemaker" to be
denied service. That's a problem with this law and society in general: Silent
discrimination happens all the time, but as long as you don't say anything
about it, no one will "know."
Unfortunately for people like pop
singer Madonna, being tucked away in her castle in the UK, occasionally speaking
in a fake British accent and imagining that she is the reincarnation of a duchess
of American extraction—thus far away from the scene—leads to inane comments like
this:
Gay rights are way more advanced than women’s rights. People are a lot
more open-minded to the gay community than they are to women, period. It’s
moved along for the gay community, for the African-American community, but
women are still just trading on their ass. To me, the last great frontier is
women…Women are still the most marginalized group. They’re still the group that
people won’t let change. [To be a successful woman,] you must fit into this
box: You must behave this way, dress this way.
So sayeth the person who despite some
marginal success, as she nears 60, in foreign countries by aping Euro-dance
trends and saying words like mother-f%@#er at her concerts, but otherwise means
nothing in the USA these days, save to feminist culture critics. Don’t bother
asking Earth to Madonna concerning the above statement; she probably expends
equal effort forgetting that she has a brother (a white male) living on the
streets. Let’s just say that Madonna
lives in an alternate fantasy world that bears no relation with reality, and
only feminists and gender activists recognize. Frankly, I don’t see her or Lady
Gaga dressing to anyone else’s “expectations,” and these days a woman wearing a
skirt is almost a subversive act.
“People are a lot more
open-minded to the gay community than they are to women, period.” Is that so? And
compared to the black community? Huh? How about the Latino community, the
national scapegoat for everything (outside of Obama)? Is Madonna crazy? Is she
off her medication? Is she high on meth?
No (or at least I don’t think so), but perhaps this is evidence of a
sociopathic level of self-obsession that unfortunately many otherwise empirically
highly successful white women (well, there is Opra Winfrey, who is just plain
sexist) wallow in such self-pity. Madonna apparently believes she is not
receiving the “respect” she “deserves,” and indignant that she is increasingly
irrelevant in the U.S. (and a joke and a fraud in Britain).
Of course, the reality that
Madonna can’t face honestly is that despite all these supposed “barriers” for
women, she is practically a billionaire, who made her money being one of the
most successful poseurs in history, who married a Brit, took his castle after
she divorced him, and pretends that she is better than you or I by speaking in
that phony British accent, and believes she is the Duchess of Windsor
reincarnated. In Madonna’s world, it doesn’t matter that this duchess and her
husband the Duke were Nazi sympathizers and even friends with leading Nazis
(one wonders what beliefs they shared); surface detail is all that matters in
Madonna’s world.
Or at least for Madonna; being
deep isn’t her bag, although she frequently confuses her superficial (and often
vulgar) proclamations as such—that is to say, when she isn’t shamelessly
pandering to people young enough to be her grandchildren. Then again, this shameless
crassness has always fit her like a glove. She isn’t doing white feminism any
favors by claiming that white women are doing worse than minorities and gays,
because you don’t need the eye test to know that belief comes from an excess of
self-obsession, principally fed by mendacious media gender advocacy that is
curiously mixed with the egotism and pomposity.
But back to reality. Are white
women like Madonna really more “oppressed” than other groups? This can only be
true if they have an extremely high opinion of themselves, believe in white
“privilege”—remember feminist Eleanor Smeal’s “racism against white women”
quote (of course not)?—and basically harbor prejudices and stereotypes against
other demographics they feel superior to (being white). Take Madonna, for
example, having already mentioned that she cavorts as if she is a British peer.
Anyone familiar with her history knows that she is an almost pathological
exhibitionist who cares not one wit what other people thought of her or what
she said or did; she just doesn’t like
that anyone has an opinion on it—and it “oppresses” her.
So while other people might have
an opinion that oppresses her mind, that has never stopped her from doing
whatever the hell she wanted to do (or say). There couldn’t be anyone less
oppressed by the alleged “patriarchy” or “society” than Madonna. In fact,
without the support of the male “oppressors”—like, say, record company
executives—she would be just another annoyingly egotistical exhibitionist not
worth only laughing at her pretensions. To say that women are “marginalized” is
also a travesty of truth, because we are continually bombarded with
gender-specific images and messages that suggest that the exact opposite is
true; in fact, if we take the media as an example, it would seem it would be a
truer statement that men are “marginalized.”
If we want to just get down to
the heart of the matter, there is no better place to discover something akin to
reality in employment and wage statistics. According to the February, 2015
Bureau of Labor economic news release, the unemployment rates for specific
demographics (for some reason excluding Hispanics) are as such:
White males 5.2
White females 4.2
Black males 10.9
Black females 8.7
The Bureau of Labor’s weekly
earnings tabulation as of January 2015 as broken down by demographic is as
follows:
White males 907
White females 738
Black males 667
Black females 602
Asian males 1067
Asian women 826
Hispanic males 631
Hispanic females 544
There are few things to note here
that would likely go unnoticed. One is that the weekly earnings of white
females is significantly higher than black males and even more so than Hispanic
males. No doubt that even these income figures for black males is blown out of
proportion by multi-million dollar sports contracts; it may well be that in the
private and public sector, black women earn more than black men. If white women
(like Madonna) want to make a case against white males—or better yet, both
Asian males and Asian females (who make 12 percent more than white females)—then
the ground is a bit firmer, although it has been suggested than Asians make
more money as a demographic because they concentrate in high cost urban areas
with similar higher wages. But to make a general claim of gender oppression as
Madonna does (and she is obviously not the only one) just ignores the
specifics.
For example, black men have
nearly three times the unemployment rate of white women; there are
“explanations” for this (education level is the most prominent), but given it
is a fact negates Madonna’s claim that the “rights” of minorities have “advanced” more
than people like herself is an absolute travesty of logic. Studies have shown
that white males with criminal records are more likely to be hired for jobs
than similarly qualified black males with no criminal history, and a black male
with a college degree has a harder time finding a job than a white male (and
woman) who is a high school dropout.
It is also useful to note that income
disparities are far more pronounced for those making high wages than those who
in low-income jobs; in the former, there is a vast difference between $100,000
a year and $15 million, yet both would be regarded as an exceptionally high
wage to the average laborer. This is where gender wage disparity really occurs.
At the other end, at every job I ever worked at, males and females start at the
same bare minimum wage and only marginally advance from there.
It gets worse. I was listening to
a radio commercial recently on one of the local sports station about how
(white) women were advancing in all kinds of fields of endeavor—yet things were
only getting “worse” for them. How so? Because more women (or so the ad claims)
die of heart disease than men. Despite the fact that women live significantly
longer than men, and that heart disease would be the most likely reason for
mortality for anyone at an advanced age, women have to be singled out as being
the alleged worst “victims.” So this is “red” month; but last month it was
“pink” month because breast cancer was supposed to be the worst medical
condition women suffered. What will April be? Purple month?
But some people believe what they
want to believe. In a recent post I mentioned the case of Philadelphia Eagles
football player Nate Allen, who was falsely accused of “exposing” himself after
a teenage female claimed she saw a man masturbating in his truck. Police
arrested a “usual suspect”—i.e. a black male—in this case Allen. According to
the Fort-Myers News-Press
The 15-minute interrogation of NFL player Nate Allen by Fort Myers
police Feb. 16 assumed the Cape Coral High grad was guilty of masturbating in
public and continually urged him to confess.
A transcript of the interrogation was released by the state attorney's
office Tuesday afternoon. Earlier on Tuesday Allen and his family said last
week's involvement between the NFL player and Fort Myers police left two
victims, the young girl who reported a man masturbating and Allen. They urged
changes be made in the city police policy to prevent similar victims in the
future.
Early in the interrogation, several hours after Allen was detained by
police, Allen told Detective Audenia Thomas that he had no idea why he was
there. After she told him why, Allen was adamant in his innocence throughout
the interrogation.
"I was hoping you would be honest with me," she told him.
Furthermore, she said that it could be that he's young and immature and made a
bad decision. "But you're not even man enough to even acknowledge
that," she said.
"Because I didn't do this," he answered.
Allen was emphatic in his denial of being the person the girl saw
masturbating. "I promise you...like seriously...I'm on my knees," he
said. "Seriously. It's disgusting, seriously."
As the interrogation wound down, the detective asked Allen if he needed
a few moments to reflect.
"No, I need a moment to understand why someone would say something
like that," he said.
"You don't need a few moments," she asked again. "No
because this is the truth," he countered. "I'm telling you the truth.
I promise you, I would never do anything like this ... ever."
No comments:
Post a Comment