This past week President Obama,
despite threats from Republicans, revealed his intention to use his executive
powers to enact a limited variation of the long-delayed immigration “reform.” This
is, after all, a nation of immigrants, and throughout this country’s history
there always has been some particular group that has aroused grumbling from the
self-styled “natives.” His “strategy” of delaying action on the issue to
“protect” vulnerable Democrats in the Senate proved a costly failure, and in at
least three states—Florida, Texas and Colorado—it appears to have cost
Democratic candidates enough lost votes among Latinos to make the difference in
several key elections.
Republicans are threatening dire
consequences, but I think that most people will support or be indifferent to Obama’s
action—not the proposals specifically, but as a means of forcing movement on
the part of Congress, especially the recalcitrant House led by the weak-willed
John Boehner. For certain the Republican’s racist and nativist constituency will
cry bloody murder, but they are a fringe minority who deserve to be ignored.
Most people are tired of the issue being used by Republicans as a propaganda
tool every election to inspire hate.
While there has been some talk of how
Republicans in Texas and Colorado managed to sway a sizable minority of Latino
voters, this was only because the candidate avoided inflaming that segment by
speaking of their position on immigration and the other instruments that
inspire hate among the white electorate, while at least in Colorado the
incumbent Democratic Senate candidate, Mark Udall, refused—out of apparent fear of alienating
certain white voters—to use the Republicans stand on immigration against them.
The proposals that Obama unveiled
in his speech this past week offers a patronizing deal for immigrants who “play
by the rules,” and it isn’t much of a “deal.” Those who have lived in the
country for at least five years and have not committed any crimes (other than
being in the country) can come out of the “shadows” and expose themselves by
registering, pass a criminal background check, and are “willing to pay your
fair share of the taxes,” you can apply for “temporary” status. That’s all. “All
we're saying is we're not going to deport you.” At least not right away.
Unfortunately, Obama used
language that is part of the hate propaganda and perpetuates many
falsehoods—the biggest that undocumented workers don’t pay taxes. Outside of
street corner day laborers, all who work pay payroll taxes—including Social
Security taxes, regardless if they are eligible for Social Security in the
future or not. Even in states that do not have income taxes but sales taxes,
undocumented workers pay the same taxes as everyone else does, without being
eligible for all of the benefits that derive from it.
Obama also implied than many of
them are criminals—again a Republican propaganda tool without citing actual
numbers or crime rates. Yet while these people are often doing jobs that are
hard to fill because no one wants to do them, Obama proposes to take
high-paying tech jobs away from “real” Americans and give them to immigrants
from Asia. Apparently businesses like Microsoft want them because they don’t
cost as much, and they want the jobs because it is still better than what they
are receiving in their home countries.
Obama touts about the only thing
that has been done on immigration “reform”—engaging in the kind of mass
deportations not seen since “Operation Wetback” in the 1950s, obviously
angering many Latino activists. Obama went on to show a lack of knowledge of
historical context, of how the U.S. has used undocumented workers for both
labor and political propaganda tools throughout its history. This cross traffic
has been going ever since the U.S. “bought” California and the Southwest from
Mexico, when there already was a population of Mexicans present, and most chose
to stay. The fact that many cities in this region have Spanish names is
testimony to the fact of the Mexican presence.
Obama also failed to mention that
another reason why there is so much indifference to immigration “rules” is that
there is a clear bias in immigration standards, and it is considerably more
difficult for Latin Americans (save for Cubans) to legally immigrate to this
country than for any other demographic. That more than anything else is the
reason why the “system” is “broken.”
Yet Republicans are up in arms
over these weak proposals. Obama could have said nothing at all and accomplished
more; all he did was “promise” to expose hardworking, law-abiding undocumented
workers to easier deportation if his “plan” is shot down. I wonder how many
will actually take him up on his “offer.” The only “positive” I can see is if,
as noted earlier, that this instills a public “debate” on the lack of movement
on immigration reform by the Republicans.
The more I look into this, the
more I see as it as some kind of jest in poor taste. What is really needed is a
common sense program that recognizes the reality of immigrant labor and makes
it easier—not harder, for immigrant workers to legally work in the country
without fear of ICE harassment; if employers were not hamstrung in hiring even
seasonal workers because of immigration rules that have no sense of reality but
play into the public’s paranoia, immigrant workers would feel more “free” to
leave if there was no work.
Obama’s proposal admittedly is
limited by what his executive authority allows, but he ignores the true
failings of U.S. immigration policy—that is deliberately biased against Latin
Americans, and instead uses the propaganda of prejudice he claims to oppose
when used by Republicans. This is extremely unfortunate, and does nothing to
further reform. The Republicans could do little worse, besides what they are
doing now, which is nothing.
No comments:
Post a Comment